What information is included in the first Office action of a CPA?
The first Office action of a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) includes important information for the applicant. According to MPEP ¶ 2.35, the examiner should: Advise the applicant that a ‘conditional’ request for a CPA is treated as an unconditional request Confirm that the CPA is acceptable and has been established Provide notice that an action…
Read MoreWhat information is included in the USPTO’s acknowledgment of a CPA request?
When acknowledging a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) request, the USPTO includes specific details as outlined in MPEP ¶ 2.35. The acknowledgment typically includes: The filing date of the CPA request The application number of the prior application on which the CPA is based A statement that the CPA request is acceptable Confirmation that a CPA…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of MPEP ¶ 2.32 regarding inventor deletion in CPAs?
MPEP ¶ 2.32 provides guidance for patent examiners on how to acknowledge and process requests to delete a named inventor in Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) for design patents. The paragraph serves several purposes: It offers a standardized response for examiners to use when acknowledging the receipt of a request to delete an inventor. It confirms…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO communicate when an attorney or agent is suspended?
When an attorney or agent is suspended, the USPTO does not communicate with them. Instead: For sole practitioners: The Office action is mailed to the address of the first named applicant in the application. For multiple practitioners: The Office action is mailed to the first named unsuspended registered practitioner of record and to the first…
Read MoreHow is double correspondence handled in patent applications?
The USPTO generally does not engage in double correspondence with applicants and their representatives. Specifically: The Office will not correspond with both an applicant and their attorney/agent. The Office will not correspond with more than one attorney/agent. If double correspondence is attempted, the examiner will include form paragraph 4.01 in the next Office action. According…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 6.17 used for in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 6.17 is a tool used by patent examiners to notify applicants about issues with claim numbering. According to MPEP 608.01(j), this form paragraph is titled “Numbering of Claims, 37 CFR 1.126” and is used when the numbering of claims does not comply with the regulations. The paragraph states: “The numbering of claims is…
Read MoreWhat happens if replacement drawings are not received by the USPTO?
If an applicant files an amendment stating that replacement sheets of drawings are included, but these drawings are not found in the Image File Wrapper (IFW), the examiner must take specific action. According to MPEP 608.02(h): “When an amendment is filed stating that replacement sheets of drawings are filed with the amendment and such drawings…
Read MoreWhat types of patent-related correspondence can be sent by facsimile to the USPTO?
According to MPEP 502.01, various types of patent-related correspondence can be transmitted by facsimile to the USPTO, including: Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) (for design applications only) Amendments Declarations Petitions Information Disclosure Statements (IDS) Terminal disclaimers Notices of appeal and appeal briefs Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs) under 37 CFR 1.114…
Read MoreHow does revocation of power of attorney affect pending applications?
When a power of attorney is revoked, it affects pending applications as follows: The revocation is effective upon receipt in the USPTO. It applies to all pending applications in which the attorney or agent was appointed, unless specifically limited. The Office will not communicate further with the revoked attorney/agent. The applicant must appoint a new…
Read MoreCan an applicant communicate directly with the USPTO if they have a registered patent attorney?
Can an applicant communicate directly with the USPTO if they have a registered patent attorney? Generally, when an applicant is represented by a registered patent attorney or agent, direct communication between the applicant and the USPTO is discouraged. The USPTO has specific rules regarding this situation: The USPTO will communicate directly with the registered attorney…
Read More