How does the USPTO handle terms of degree in patent claims?

The USPTO handles terms of degree in patent claims by evaluating whether the specification provides some standard for measuring that degree. According to MPEP 2173.02: “Terms of degree are not necessarily indefinite… If the specification does provide some standard for measuring that degree, a rejection is not warranted… For example, in Ex parte Oetiker, 23…

Read More

What is relative terminology in patent claims?

Relative terminology in patent claims refers to language that uses terms of degree or comparative expressions. According to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2173.05(b), “The use of relative terminology in claim language, including terms of degree, does not automatically render the claim indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second…

Read More

How does the MPEP treat terms of degree in patent claims?

The MPEP addresses terms of degree in patent claims in MPEP 2173.05(b). Terms of degree are relative terms that require careful consideration to determine if they are definite. The MPEP states: “Terms of degree are not necessarily indefinite. […] If the specification does not provide some standard for measuring that degree, a determination must be…

Read More

How are terms of degree evaluated in patent claims?

Terms of degree in patent claims are evaluated based on whether they provide enough certainty to one of skill in the art when read in the context of the invention. The MPEP 2173.05(b) states: “When a term of degree is used in the claim, the examiner should determine whether the specification provides some standard for…

Read More