TwitterLinkedinSkypeRssEmail
+1.970.776.4355
BlueIron IP
  • About
  • IP-Backed Loans
  • Blog
  • All FAQs
    • Patent Loans
    • Patent Law FAQ
  • Contact
  • Schedule a Call

How is the statutory basis for pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) rejections stated?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 30, 2024

The statutory basis for pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) rejections is stated using form paragraph 7.20.fti. This paragraph provides the full text of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as follows: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the…

Read More

What is the statutory basis for ex parte reexamination of patents?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 30, 2024

The statutory basis for ex parte reexamination of patents was established on July 1, 1981, through sections 301-307 of title 35, United States Code, added by Public Law 96-517. The MPEP states: “Statutory basis for citation of prior art patents or printed publications in patent files and ex parte reexamination of patents became available on…

Read More

What is form paragraph 7.04.01 used for in patent examination?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

Form paragraph 7.04.01 is used to state the statutory basis for patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. It must be included at the beginning of all first actions on the merits and final rejections that involve 35 U.S.C. 101. The MPEP provides the following text for this form paragraph: “35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows:…

Read More

What is the statutory basis for restriction practice in patent applications?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 27, 2024

The statutory basis for restriction practice in patent applications is found in 35 U.S.C. 121. This statute states: “If two or more independent and distinct inventions are claimed in one application, the Director may require the application to be restricted to one of the inventions.” This provision gives the USPTO the authority to require applicants…

Read More

How does changing the statutory basis affect grounds of rejection?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 27, 2024

Changing the statutory basis of a rejection from one section of the statute to another typically constitutes a new ground of rejection in patent appeals. According to MPEP 1207.03(a): “Factual situations that have been found to constitute a new ground of rejection include… Changing the statutory basis of rejection from one section of the statute…

Read More

When does changing the statutory basis of rejection not constitute a new ground?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 27, 2024

Changing the statutory basis of rejection does not always constitute a new ground of rejection. According to MPEP 1207.03(a), there are situations where such changes are not considered new grounds: 1. Changing from 35 U.S.C. 103 to 35 U.S.C. 102, but relying on the same teachings: “If the examiner’s answer changes the statutory basis of…

Read More

Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Stolen Valor: How Sleazy Patent Attorneys Abuse Inventorship
  • Four Horsemen of the Investor Apocalypse
  • AI-Assisted Patent Search Tools Exacerbate Inventor Biases
  • Your Patent Attorney Is NOT Giving Business Advice
  • Contempt from Crowdfunded Equity
  • Entrepreneurs and Imposter Syndrome
  • AI Startups: Protect Everything EXCEPT the Patent
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Media Kit
BlueIron IP | 1635 Foxtrail Drive, Ste 321 | Loveland, Colorado 80538 | USA