How does the “special dispatch” requirement affect prior art submissions in ex parte reexamination?
The “special dispatch” requirement, as mandated by 35 U.S.C. 305, significantly affects prior art submissions in ex parte reexamination, especially after the Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (NIRC) has been mailed. The MPEP explains: “To automatically delay prosecution by pulling the proceeding from that process when such a submission has been…
Read MoreWhat is the importance of special dispatch in ex parte reexamination proceedings?
Special dispatch is a crucial aspect of ex parte reexamination proceedings, as mandated by law. The MPEP states: Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 305, all ex parte reexamination proceedings must be conducted with special dispatch within the Office. This applies to the transfer of reexamination proceedings. This requirement ensures that reexamination proceedings, including any transfers, are…
Read MoreWhat types of status reports are available for reexamination proceedings?
Various status reports are available for reexamination proceedings to ensure they are processed with “special dispatch.” According to MPEP 2235: “Various reports can be generated for the event reporting discussed above. The primary purpose of these reports is to assure that reexaminations are, in fact, processed with “special dispatch.”“ Some examples of available reports include:…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for submitting prior art after the Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (NIRC)?
Submitting prior art after the Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (NIRC) requires meeting specific conditions due to the statutory mandate for “special dispatch” in reexamination proceedings. The MPEP states: “[T]he submission must be accompanied by (A) a factual accounting providing a sufficient explanation of why the information submitted could not have…
Read MoreWhat happens when multiple reexamination proceedings are filed for the same patent?
When multiple reexamination proceedings are filed for the same patent, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may decide to merge the proceedings or suspend one of them. According to MPEP 2686.01, “Where a second request for reexamination is filed and reexamination is ordered, and a first reexamination proceeding is pending, the proceedings will be…
Read MoreWhat are the key procedures for conducting inter partes reexamination proceedings?
Inter partes reexamination proceedings are conducted according to specific procedures established by law and regulation. According to MPEP 2654: Reexamination follows procedures similar to initial examination, as stated in 35 U.S.C. 314(a): “Except as otherwise provided in this section, reexamination shall be conducted according to the procedures established for initial examination under the provisions of…
Read MoreWhat are the time extensions available in inter partes reexamination proceedings?
Time extensions in inter partes reexamination proceedings are limited and strictly regulated. The MPEP states: Extensions of time under 37 CFR 1.136(a) will not be permitted in inter partes reexamination proceedings because the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136 apply only to “an applicant” and not to parties in a reexamination proceeding. Key points about time…
Read MoreWhat happens after the patent owner responds and third party comments in an inter partes reexamination?
After the patent owner responds and any third party comments are received, the patent under reexamination is reconsidered. The MPEP states: “The patent owner and the third party requester will be notified as to any claims rejected, any claims found patentable and any objections or requirements made.” This process continues until the examiner determines the…
Read MoreHow does concurrent litigation affect inter partes reexamination proceedings?
Concurrent litigation can significantly impact inter partes reexamination proceedings. The key points to consider are: The USPTO is not bound by court decisions on patent validity and will generally continue reexamination proceedings unless statutorily required to terminate them. A final court decision of invalidity will typically result in termination of the reexamination for those claims…
Read MoreWhat happens when a patent in inter partes reexamination becomes involved in an interference?
When a patent undergoing inter partes reexamination becomes involved in an interference proceeding, the general policy is that the reexamination will not be delayed or stayed. This is due to the requirement in 35 U.S.C. 314(c) that all reexamination proceedings be conducted with “special dispatch” within the Office. As stated in the MPEP: In general,…
Read More