How does a restriction requirement affect the safe harbor provision of 35 U.S.C. 121?
How does a restriction requirement affect the safe harbor provision of 35 U.S.C. 121? A restriction requirement plays a crucial role in triggering the safe harbor provision of 35 U.S.C. 121. According to MPEP 804.01: “The protection of 35 U.S.C. 121 does not extend to all types of continuing applications, stating that ‘the protection afforded…
Read MoreWhat options does an applicant have when facing a restriction requirement for product, process of making, and process of using claims?
When an application contains claims to a product, process of making, and process of using, the applicant may face a restriction requirement. According to MPEP 806.05(i): “Where an application contains claims to a product, claims to a process specially adapted for (i.e., not patentably distinct from, as defined in MPEP § 806.05(f)) making the product,…
Read MoreDoes a restriction requirement in a parent application carry over to a continuation application?
No, a restriction requirement made in a parent application does not automatically carry over to a continuation, continuation-in-part (CIP), or divisional application. The MPEP 819 cites a Federal Circuit decision: “See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Pharmachemie BV, 361 F.3d 1343, 1348, 70 USPQ2d 1097, 1100 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (An original restriction requirement in an earlier…
Read MoreWhat happens to the restriction requirement after rejoinder?
When rejoinder occurs, the restriction requirement is typically withdrawn, either partially or fully. According to MPEP 821.04: “The requirement for restriction between the rejoined inventions must be withdrawn.” However, it’s important to note that the withdrawal of the restriction requirement can have implications for potential double patenting issues. The MPEP states: “Any claim(s) presented in…
Read MoreCan a restriction requirement be made after an action on the merits?
Yes, a restriction requirement can be made after an action on the merits, but certain conditions apply. According to MPEP 811: “Before requiring restriction of claims previously examined on the merits, the examiner must consider whether there will be a serious search and/or examination burden if restriction is not required.” This means that while it’s…
Read MoreCan a restriction requirement be made between a product and its method of use if there’s only one method claimed?
Yes, a restriction requirement can be made between a product and its method of use even if there’s only one method claimed. According to MPEP 806.05(i): “Even though there is only one method of using claimed, if the product can be used in other ways, it is proper to make a restriction requirement between the…
Read MoreWhen should restriction not be required despite distinct inventions?
Restriction should not be required when there is an express admission that the claimed inventions would have been obvious over each other within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 103. The MPEP 803 cites a specific case: “If there is an express admission that the claimed inventions would have been obvious over each other within the…
Read MoreWhat does “restriction becomes proper at a later stage” mean in patent prosecution?
In the context of patent prosecution, the phrase “restriction becomes proper at a later stage” refers to a situation where circumstances change during the examination process, making a previously improper restriction requirement now appropriate. This concept is addressed in MPEP 811.03, which states: “Where a requirement to restrict is made and thereafter withdrawn as improper,…
Read MoreHow can an applicant respond to a restriction requirement?
When faced with a restriction requirement, an applicant has several options for response, as outlined in MPEP 817. The key elements of a proper response include: Electing an invention to be examined Identifying the claims encompassing the elected invention Optionally, traversing the requirement Form Paragraph 8.21 in the MPEP provides guidance on the applicant’s response…
Read MoreHow can an applicant respond to a restriction requirement in a design patent application?
When responding to a restriction requirement in a design patent application, an applicant has several options: Elect one group of designs for prosecution without traverse. Elect one group of designs for prosecution with traverse, providing arguments against the restriction. Petition to review the requirement. If electing with traverse, the MPEP advises: “If a response to…
Read More