TwitterLinkedinSkypeRssEmail
+1.970.776.4355
BlueIron IP
  • About
  • Services
    • Patent Financing by BlueIron
    • IP Insurance by BlueIron
    • Loans Using Patents As Collateral
  • Blog
  • All FAQs
    • Patent Financing
    • Patent Loans
    • Patent Insurance
    • Patent Law FAQ
  • Contact
  • Schedule a Call

What are the time periods for response in ex parte reexamination proceedings?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 30, 2024

In ex parte reexamination proceedings, specific time periods are set for responses. According to MPEP 2254: “The time periods set for response are one month (30 days) from the mailing date of the Office action for the patent owner, and one month (30 days) from the date of service for any third party requester.“ However,…

Read More

Is there a minimum time requirement for attorney withdrawal in patent proceedings?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 30, 2024

No, there is no longer a minimum time requirement for attorney withdrawal in patent proceedings. The MPEP 2223 states: “For a practitioner to withdraw from a patent and/or a reexamination proceeding, the Office no longer requires that there be at least 30 days remaining in any running period for response between the approval of a…

Read More

What are the time periods for response in an inter partes reexamination proceeding?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

The time periods for response in an inter partes reexamination proceeding vary depending on the stage of the process. Here are some key timeframes: After a non-Action Closing Prosecution (non-ACP) Office action: The patent owner typically has two months to respond. After an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP): The patent owner usually has 30 days or…

Read More

How does the Patent Law Treaty affect USPTO response periods?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 10, 2024

The Patent Law Treaty (PLT) has influenced USPTO response periods for most Office actions. According to MPEP 710.02(b), The Patent Law Treaty (PLT), which entered into force with respect to the United States on December 18, 2013, provides for a time period of at least two months for replies to most Office actions and other…

Read More

What are the time limits for responding to a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 10, 2024

What are the time limits for responding to a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105? The time limits for responding to a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 are as follows: For a non-final Office action: The response period is typically two months, which may be extended up to six months from the…

Read More

Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • The Provisional Patent Hoax
  • How accelerators and angel groups lose their way.
  • The Endless Science Project
  • Calling yourself an “Expert”
  • Patents Age Like Fine Wine
  • Trading on the Differences
  • IP Valuation in a Regulatory Framework

Sign Me Up

Get weekly updates

This post was tagged

Angel Investing Attorney Client Relationship best mode description claims Design Patents Entrepreneurship Foreign Patents How To Get A Patent How To Patent An Idea Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Strategies Invent invention description Invest in Startups Investment Grade Patents Investor Due Diligence IP Due Diligence long descriptions Non Disclosure Agreement Patent Attorney patent attorneys patent claims Patent Cost Patent Drafting Patent Enforcement Patent Financing Patent Insurance Patent Law Firms Patent Licensing Patent Litigation Patent Portfolio Patent Prosecution Patent Protection patent specification Patent Value problems with patents Provisional Patent provisional patent applications provisional patents provisionals Seed Capital Tech Startups Trade Secret Utility Patents Why Get A Patent
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Media Kit
BlueIron IP | 1635 Foxtrail Drive, Ste 321 | Loveland, Colorado 80538 | USA