How are inconsistencies in reproductions handled in international design applications?

Inconsistencies in reproductions are addressed based on their severity. According to MPEP 2920.04(b): 1. Minor inconsistencies: “When inconsistencies are found among the views, the examiner should object to the reproductions and request that the views be made consistent.” 2. Major inconsistencies: “When the inconsistencies are of such magnitude that the overall appearance of the design…

Read More

What are the guidelines for representing industrial designs in reproductions?

The guidelines for representing industrial designs in reproductions are outlined in the Administrative Instructions for the Hague Agreement. Key points include: Reproductions should represent the industrial design alone or the product in relation to which the design is to be used. No other objects, accessories, persons, or animals should be included in the representation. According…

Read More

Can examiners object to reproductions in published international registrations?

Generally, examiners should not object to reproductions that were published as part of an international registration on formal grounds. The MPEP 2920.04(b) states: “Reproductions published as part of the international registration have been reviewed by the International Bureau for compliance with the formal requirements of Hague Agreement Rule 9 and Part Four of the Administrative…

Read More

How should broken lines be used in international design application reproductions?

How should broken lines be used in international design application reproductions? Broken lines in international design application reproductions serve specific purposes and must be used correctly. The MPEP 2920.04(b) states: “Broken lines may be used to show visible environmental structure, but may not be used to show hidden planes and surfaces that cannot be seen…

Read More