What are the requirements for invoking the joint research agreement provisions of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C)?

To invoke the joint research agreement provisions of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C), an applicant must: Amend the specification to disclose the names of the parties to the joint research agreement, if not already disclosed, in accordance with 37 CFR 1.71(g). Submit the required statement to invoke the prior art exception. According to the MPEP, this statement…

Read More

How does the prior art exception affect double patenting rejections?

The prior art exception under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) can have implications for double patenting rejections. According to MPEP 717.02(c): Commonly owned applications of different inventive entities may be rejected on the ground of double patenting, even if the later filed application claims 35 U.S.C. 120 benefit to the earlier application. Double patenting rejections may arise…

Read More

How does the prior art exception under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) affect PCT applications?

How does the prior art exception under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) affect PCT applications? The prior art exception under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) has specific implications for PCT applications. The MPEP 717.02(a) states: “The U.S. patent document that resulted from a PCT application filed before March 16, 2013, is available as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e)…

Read More

How can the prior art exception under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) be invoked for joint research agreements?

The prior art exception under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) can also be invoked for joint research agreements. The MPEP outlines the requirements: In order to invoke a joint research agreement to establish that the 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception applies to a disclosure, the applicant (or patent owner) must provide a statement that the disclosure of the…

Read More

How does the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception differ from pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)?

How does the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception differ from pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)? The AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception and the pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) have some key differences: Scope of Application: AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) applies to both novelty (35 U.S.C. 102) and obviousness (35 U.S.C. 103) rejections, while pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)…

Read More

What is the relationship between AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) and joint research agreements?

What is the relationship between AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) and joint research agreements? AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) includes provisions for joint research agreements (JRAs) that can disqualify certain prior art. This relationship is important for collaborative research efforts. Key points include: Subject matter disclosed and claimed invention must have been made by or on behalf…

Read More

What is the significance of the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception in patent examination?

The AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception is significant in patent examination as it disqualifies certain prior art that would otherwise be used against an application. Specifically, the MPEP states: ‘AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) provides that disclosures shall not be prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) if the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention,…

Read More

What is the effective date for the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception?

What is the effective date for the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception? The AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception became effective on March 16, 2013. This exception applies to any patent, patent application publication, or WIPO published application that names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, where…

Read More