How does a joint research agreement affect patent examination under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)?

A joint research agreement can have significant effects on patent examination under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c). The MPEP provides an example: “Employee B’s invention claimed in his application was made after the joint research agreement was entered into, and it was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the joint agreement.…

Read More

How can an applicant establish common ownership to disqualify prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)?

An applicant can establish common ownership to disqualify prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) by submitting a clear and conspicuous statement that the application and the reference were, at the time the invention was made, owned by, or subject to an obligation of assignment to, the same person. This statement must be signed in…

Read More

What is the significance of the “as of the effective filing date” phrase in Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)?

What is the significance of the “as of the effective filing date” phrase in Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)? The phrase “as of the effective filing date” in Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) is crucial for determining the applicability of the common ownership or joint research agreement exception. According to MPEP 2146.02: “The phrase ‘as of the…

Read More

How did the CREATE Act affect pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)?

The Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement Act of 2004 (CREATE Act) significantly expanded the scope of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c). The MPEP states: “The CREATE Act amended pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) to provide that subject matter developed by another person and a claimed invention shall be deemed to have been owned by the same person…

Read More