What are “patentably indistinct claims” in the context of interfering applications?
“Patentably indistinct claims” in the context of interfering applications refer to claims from different applications that are substantially similar or overlapping in scope. According to MPEP 2304.01(d): “Interfering claims of applications with either the same assignee or the same inventive entity are ‘patentably indistinct claims’ within the meaning of 37 CFR 1.78(f).” These claims are…
Read MoreWhat are patentably indistinct claims in patent applications?
Patentably indistinct claims are claims in two or more applications filed by the same applicant or assignee that are substantially similar in scope and content. According to MPEP 822, “Where two or more applications filed by the same applicant or assignee contain patentably indistinct claims, elimination of such claims from all but one application may…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 8.29 used for in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 8.29 is used by patent examiners when they encounter patentably indistinct claims in copending applications. According to MPEP 822, “Form paragraph 8.29 should be used when the conflicting claims are identical or conceded by applicant not to be patentably distinct.” The form paragraph states: Claim [1] of this application is patentably indistinct from…
Read MoreWhat options does an applicant have when faced with a Form Paragraph 8.29 rejection?
When an applicant receives a rejection using Form Paragraph 8.29, they have two main options: Cancel patentably indistinct claims: The applicant can choose to cancel the patentably indistinct claims from all but one application. This eliminates redundancy and streamlines the examination process. Maintain a clear line of demarcation: The applicant can choose to keep the…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of preventing the issuance of two patents with patentably indistinct claims?
The purpose of preventing the issuance of two patents with patentably indistinct claims to different parties is to uphold the fundamental principle of patent law that only one patent should be granted for a single invention. This is explained in MPEP 717.01(d), which cites relevant case law: “See In re Deckler, 977 F.2d 1449, 1451–52,…
Read More