What is the role of an Interference Practice Specialist (IPS) in patent interferences?
An Interference Practice Specialist (IPS) plays a crucial role in the interference process. According to MPEP 2304: “In either circumstance, the examiner must consult with an Interference Practice Specialist (IPS), who may then refer the suggested interference to the Board.” The IPS serves as an expert consultant for examiners when an interference is suggested. They…
Read MoreWhat are the general practices for handling potential interferences in patent applications?
The MPEP outlines several general practices for handling potential interferences in patent applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g). These include: Practice 1: Consult an Interference Practice Specialist (IPS) when a potential interference is identified. Practice 2: When one application is in condition for allowance and another is not, generally allow the first application. Practice…
Read MoreWhat is Form PTO-850 in patent interference proceedings?
Form PTO-850 is a document that the patent examiner must complete when suggesting an interference to the Board. According to MPEP 2304.04(a), “The examiner must also complete Form PTO-850.” This form likely contains essential information about the suggested interference, including details about the interfering claims and the basis for the interference. To learn more: Form…
Read MoreWhat is the examiner’s role in patent interference proceedings?
The examiner’s role in patent interference proceedings is primarily to verify that the formal requirements for suggesting an interference are met, rather than to agree or disagree with the suggestion itself. According to MPEP 2304.02(b): “The examiner need not agree with the applicant’s suggestion. The examiner’s role is to confirm that there are otherwise patentable…
Read MoreWhat is an examiner suggestion in patent interference proceedings?
An examiner suggestion in patent interference proceedings refers to the examiner’s ability to require an applicant to add a claim to provoke an interference. This is outlined in 37 CFR 41.202(c), which states: “An examiner may require an applicant to add a claim to provoke an interference. Failure to satisfy the requirement within a period…
Read MoreWhat form should an examiner use to require an applicant to add a claim for interference?
When an examiner needs to require an applicant to add a claim for interference, they should use Form Paragraph 23.04. The MPEP provides the specific language for this form paragraph, which includes: “The following allowable claim from [1] is required to be added for the purpose of an interference: [2]” The form paragraph also includes…
Read MoreWhat are ex parte communications in patent interference proceedings?
Ex parte communications in patent interference proceedings refer to private communications about the case with a Board member or Board employee assigned to the proceeding, without the presence or knowledge of the other party. These communications are strictly prohibited in inter partes proceedings, including interferences. As stated in MPEP 2307.01: “An ex parte communication about…
Read MoreWhat is the legal concept of estoppel in patent interference proceedings?
In patent interference proceedings, estoppel is a legal concept that prevents a party from raising an issue if they have already lost on that issue during the interference. This principle is outlined in MPEP 2308.03(a), which states: “A party is barred (estopped) from raising an issue if the party lost on the issue during the…
Read MoreHow does estoppel on the merits work in patent interference cases?
Estoppel on the merits in patent interference cases prevents a losing party from seeking claims that are anticipated or obvious based on the subject matter of the lost count. According to MPEP 2308.03: “A losing party is barred on the merits from seeking a claim that would have been anticipated or rendered obvious by the…
Read MoreWhat is a disclaimer in the context of patent interference proceedings?
In the context of patent interference proceedings, a disclaimer refers to a situation where an applicant is deemed to have given up their right to claim certain subject matter. The MPEP section 2304.04(c) explains that claims may be rejected on the ground that the applicant has disclaimed the subject matter involved. This can arise from:…
Read More