What is a written opinion in the context of international patent searches?
A written opinion is an essential document produced alongside the international search report during the PCT application process. According to MPEP 1843, the written opinion serves several important purposes: It indicates whether the claimed invention appears to be novel, involve an inventive step (non-obvious), and be industrially applicable. It points out any defects in the…
Read MoreCan a restriction requirement be withdrawn after reconsideration?
Yes, a restriction requirement can be withdrawn after reconsideration. If the examiner determines that the requirement was improper, they should: Clearly state in the next Office action that the requirement is withdrawn in whole or in part Specify which groups have been reinstated Provide an action on the merits for all claims directed to the…
Read MoreCan an examiner withdraw the election of species requirement in a Markush claim?
Can an examiner withdraw the election of species requirement in a Markush claim? Yes, an examiner can withdraw the election of species requirement in a Markush claim under certain circumstances. According to MPEP 803.02: “If on examination the examiner finds that the elected species is allowable and determines that all claims to species are allowable,…
Read MoreCan I withdraw a Pre-Appeal Brief Review Request?
The MPEP does not provide a specific provision for withdrawing a Pre-Appeal Brief Review Request. However, it does state that certain actions by the applicant will terminate the panel’s review: The panel’s review will be terminated if the applicant files any of the following responses after filing a request, but prior to a decision by…
Read MoreWhat is WIPO Standard ST.16 and why is it important for patent examiners?
WIPO Standard ST.16 is a crucial resource for patent examiners, as outlined in MPEP 1851: “The standard codes for identifying different kinds of patent documents are found in the ‘WIPO Handbook on Industrial Property Information and Documentation’ – WIPO Standard ST.16 which is published by the World Intellectual Property Organization.” This standard provides codes for…
Read MoreWho is responsible for making a restriction requirement in patent applications?
The primary responsibility for making a restriction requirement in patent applications lies with the assigned examiner. According to MPEP 812, “The examiner to which the application has been assigned will make the restriction requirement, unless the classification is not reasonably correct and complete.” This means that the examiner who is initially assigned to review the…
Read MoreWho can sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction?
According to MPEP 803.01, only examiners with specific signatory authority can sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction: “Only an examiner with permanent full signatory authority or temporary full signatory authority may sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction.” This requirement ensures that experienced examiners review and approve these…
Read MoreWhere can I find information about protest procedures in patent examination?
Information about protest procedures in patent examination can be found in MPEP Chapter 1900. As stated in MPEP 1511: “See MPEP Chapter 1900 for practice and procedure in protest.” This chapter provides comprehensive guidance on the protest process, including when and how to file a protest, what information can be submitted, and how the USPTO…
Read MoreWhen should a Notice of Allowability be issued?
A Notice of Allowability should be issued promptly whenever an application has been placed in condition for allowance. The MPEP 1302.03 states: “In all instances, both before and after final rejection, in which an application is placed in condition for allowance, applicant should be notified promptly of allowability of the claims by a Notice of…
Read MoreWhen is it necessary to inspect previously abandoned application papers or granted patents during patent examination?
During patent examination, it becomes necessary to inspect previously abandoned application papers or granted patents in certain situations: When examining a reissue application During a reexamination proceeding In other cases where historical information or prior art is relevant to the current examination The MPEP clearly states: In the examination of an application, it is sometimes…
Read More