What should patent examiners include about references not used for rejection?
When dealing with references that are not used as a basis for rejection, patent examiners are advised to provide brief information about their relevance. MPEP 707.05(c) recommends: It is recommended that the pertinent features of references which are not used as a basis for rejection be pointed out briefly. This practice helps applicants understand the…
Read MoreWhat happens if an applicant submits a non-responsive reply to an Office action?
If an applicant submits a non-responsive reply to an Office action, the examiner may take specific actions. According to MPEP 714.02: ‘The examiner should not simply return or mail the papers to applicants as nonresponsive.’ Instead, the following steps may occur: The examiner may issue a notice of non-responsive amendment The applicant will be given…
Read MoreWhat is the proper way to cite a U.S. patent document in a USPTO office action?
When citing a U.S. patent document in a USPTO office action, examiners should follow these guidelines: Include the name of the inventor(s) Provide the patent number State the issue date (or publication date for pre-grant publications) Specify relevant pages, columns, lines, or claim numbers The MPEP 707.05 states: “If a U.S. patent application publication is…
Read MoreCan an applicant request reconsideration after final rejection without amending claims?
Yes, an applicant can request reconsideration after final rejection without amending claims. The MPEP 714.12 states: “An amendment after final rejection … may be made with or without request for reconsideration.” This means that an applicant can submit arguments for reconsideration without necessarily proposing amendments to the claims. Such a request might involve pointing out…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of a ‘closing prosecution’ action in patent examination?
A ‘closing prosecution’ action in patent examination serves to finalize the examination process and prepare the application for potential appeal or abandonment. The MPEP 714.12 mentions: “The examiner should treat such a reply under 37 CFR 1.116 in the same manner as any amendment after final rejection … with a view toward closing prosecution.” The…
Read MoreHow are patent interview records maintained?
The USPTO has strict requirements for maintaining records of patent interviews. According to MPEP 713: “All discussions between the applicant/practitioner and the examiner regarding the merits of a pending application will be considered an interview and are to be made of record. This includes any and all records or communications received in connection with the…
Read MoreHow should patent examiners treat different types of references in their citations?
According to MPEP 707.05(c), patent examiners should not differentiate between references used for rejection and those considered pertinent but not used as a basis for rejection. The manual states: No distinction is to be made between references on which a claim is rejected and those formerly referred to as “pertinent.” This guidance ensures that all…
Read MoreWhere can I find detailed information about notifying inaccuracies in patent amendments?
For detailed information about notifying inaccuracies in patent amendments, you should refer to MPEP § 714, subsection II. G. This is explicitly stated in MPEP 707.07(h): ‘See MPEP § 714, subsection II. G.’ This section provides comprehensive guidance on how to handle and communicate inaccuracies found in patent application amendments, which is crucial for both…
Read MoreWhat happens if an amendment after final rejection is not entered?
If an amendment after final rejection is not entered, the examiner will notify the applicant. According to MPEP 714.12: “If the amendment is not entered, the examiner will notify the applicant that the amendment has not been entered and provide the reasons for non-entry.” The examiner will explain why the amendment was not entered, which…
Read More