How do applicants receive a copy of the processed IDS from the USPTO?
Applicants receive a copy of the processed Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) as part of an Office action from the USPTO. The MPEP 609.08 states: a copy will be provided to applicant as part of an Office action. This means that after the examiner has reviewed and processed the IDS, the applicant will receive a copy…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of Form PTO-892 in patent examination?
Form PTO-892, also known as the “Notice of References Cited,” is used by patent examiners to list the identifying data of citations when referencing them for the first time in a patent examination. As stated in MPEP 707.05(c): In citing references for the first time, the identifying data of the citation should be placed on…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of an Examiner’s Letter or Action?
An Examiner’s Letter or Action, as described in MPEP 707, serves to communicate the examiner’s findings and decisions regarding a patent application. It includes: Information about the period set for reply Any attachments A ‘Summary of Action’ detailing the position taken on all claims Reasons for rejection or objection Useful information for judging the propriety…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of an examiner’s letter or action in patent examination?
The purpose of an examiner’s letter or action in patent examination is to communicate the examiner’s findings and decisions regarding the patentability of an application. According to MPEP 707, “In all Office actions, the examiner or the Office must indicate, in the Office action itself, which form paragraphs are being relied upon, to permit the…
Read MoreWhat are the different work schedules for patent examiners and how are they communicated?
Patent examiners may have different work schedules, which are communicated in their office actions to help applicants understand their availability. The MPEP provides two main form paragraphs for this purpose: Form Paragraph 7.101 for non-5/4/9 schedules Form Paragraph 7.102 for 5/4/9 schedules For example, Form Paragraph 7.102 states: “The examiner can normally be reached on…
Read MoreWhat are the key elements patent examiners check in amended applications?
According to MPEP 714.05, patent examiners should review all amended applications immediately to check the following key elements: Proper signature (MPEP § 714.01(a)) Timely filing within the statutory period or set time limit (MPEP § 710) Full responsiveness and compliance with 37 CFR 1.121 (MPEP § 714) Need for transfer based on changes (MPEP §…
Read MoreWhat should patent examiners immediately review when receiving an applicant’s action?
Patent examiners should immediately review actions by applicants, especially those filed near the end of the reply period. According to MPEP 714.05, examiners should: Determine if the action is completely responsive to the preceding Office action Prevent abandonment of the application Notify the applicant of any deficiencies if sufficient time remains The MPEP states: “Actions…
Read MoreHow are timely submitted affidavits and declarations handled by the patent examiner?
When affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 are timely submitted and admitted, the patent examiner is required to acknowledge and comment on them in the next office action. According to MPEP 717.01(f): All admitted affidavits and declarations are acknowledged and commented upon by the examiner in the next succeeding action, and an indication of…
Read MoreHow is an examiner’s contact information provided in a patent office action?
In every patent office action, the examiner’s contact information is provided for applicants to reach out with inquiries or to arrange interviews. According to MPEP 707.08, “The full surname of the examiner who prepares the Office action will, in all cases, be typed at the end of the action. The name and telephone number of…
Read MoreHow should patent examiners handle claims in each Office action?
Patent examiners should mention each pending claim by number and provide its treatment or status in every Office action. This practice is outlined in MPEP 707.07(i), which states: In every Office action, each pending claim should be mentioned by number, and its treatment or status given. This approach ensures easy traceability of a claim’s history…
Read More