How does the concept of “Art Recognized Equivalence” apply to mechanical inventions?

The concept of “Art Recognized Equivalence” applies to mechanical inventions in much the same way as it does to chemical compositions. According to MPEP 2144.06, the principle can be applied to functional or mechanical equivalents. However, it’s important to note: “The mere fact that components are claimed as members of a Markush group cannot be…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle allegations of unexpected results for different types of inventions?

How does the USPTO handle allegations of unexpected results for different types of inventions? The USPTO’s approach to allegations of unexpected results can vary depending on the type of invention. According to MPEP 716.02: For chemical inventions: Unexpected results are often demonstrated through comparative tests. The MPEP states, Evidence of unexpected results must be weighed…

Read More