How should a patent owner respond to rejections in an inter partes reexamination?

In an inter partes reexamination, a patent owner should respond to rejections by providing a clear and specific rebuttal. According to MPEP 2666: “Any request for reconsideration must be in writing and must distinctly and specifically point out each supposed error in the examiner’s action. A general allegation that the claims define a patentable invention,…

Read More

What are the required contents of a respondent brief in an inter partes reexamination?

The contents of a respondent brief are outlined in 37 CFR 41.68(b)(1). Key components include: Real Party in Interest statement Related Appeals, Interferences, and trials Status of claims Status of amendments Summary of claimed subject matter Issues to be reviewed on appeal Argument Evidence appendix Related proceedings appendix Certificate of service The MPEP emphasizes: “The…

Read More

How detailed should the statement applying prior art be in an inter partes reexamination request?

The statement applying prior art in an inter partes reexamination request should be sufficiently detailed to explain how each item of prior art applies to every claim for which reexamination is requested. The MPEP 2617 states: “The particularity should be equivalent to that usually present in a prior art rejection statement in an Office action…

Read More

What certifications are required in an inter partes reexamination request?

An inter partes reexamination request must include specific certifications as outlined in MPEP 2614. These certifications are crucial to ensure compliance with statutory provisions and to prevent abuse of the reexamination process. The required certifications are: Estoppel Certification (35 U.S.C. 317 and 315(e)): The request must include “A certification by the third party requester that…

Read More

What rights does the requester have when a patent owner corrects an omission in their response?

When a patent owner corrects an omission in their response, the requester in an inter partes reexamination has certain rights. According to MPEP 2666.30: “In this situation, the requester has thirty days from the date of service of patent owner’s corrected or supplemental response to file comments, unless only a fee (other than an excess…

Read More