What constitutes a valid ‘reply’ for a petition to excuse unintentional delay in an international design application?

A valid ‘reply’ for a petition to excuse unintentional delay in an international design application can take two forms, as specified in 37 CFR 1.1051(c): Filing a continuing application (with additional requirements if the original application hasn’t been internationally registered) A grantable petition under 37 CFR 1.1052 for applications filed indirectly with the USPTO The…

Read More

Can a U.S. applicant file an international design application directly with WIPO?

Can a U.S. applicant file an international design application directly with WIPO? No, a U.S. applicant cannot file an international design application directly with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). According to MPEP 2905, “Applicants from the United States are not permitted to file international design applications directly with the International Bureau.” U.S. applicants must…

Read More

What is indirect filing of an international design application?

Indirect filing of an international design application refers to the process of submitting the application through the office of the applicant’s Contracting Party rather than directly with the International Bureau. MPEP 2905 explains: “Pursuant to Article 4 of the Hague Agreement, an international design application may be filed either directly with the International Bureau or…

Read More

How is the filing date determined for an international design application filed indirectly?

The filing date for an international design application filed indirectly through the office of a Contracting Party is determined as follows: For applications governed exclusively by the 1999 Act: The filing date is the date the application was received by the office of the Contracting Party, provided it is received by the International Bureau within…

Read More