What is the significance of an incomplete reply in a restriction requirement response?
An incomplete reply to a restriction requirement can have significant consequences. According to MPEP 821.02, an incomplete reply may be treated as an election without traverse: Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse ( MPEP §…
Read MoreHow are incomplete replies to a Requirement for Information treated?
Incomplete replies to a Requirement for Information under 37 CFR 1.105 are handled similarly to amendments that are not fully responsive to a non-final Office action. The MPEP states, An incomplete reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement in a pending application or reexamination proceeding is handled in the same manner as an amendment not…
Read MoreHow is an incomplete reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement handled?
An incomplete reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement in a pending application or reexamination proceeding is handled in the same manner as an amendment not fully responsive to a non-final Office action. The MPEP states: “An incomplete reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement in a pending application or reexamination proceeding is handled in…
Read MoreWhat is the examiner’s obligation if the applicant’s reply is incomplete?
If the applicant’s reply is incomplete, the examiner has specific obligations as outlined in MPEP 704.14(b): Direct quote: “If the reply is incomplete, the examiner may, at his or her option, either act on the application (if sufficient information is available or no further information is required) or require the applicant to complete the reply…
Read MoreWhat constitutes a bona fide attempt to respond to a patent office action?
What constitutes a bona fide attempt to respond to a patent office action? A bona fide attempt to respond to a patent office action is a genuine effort to address the issues raised by the examiner. According to MPEP 711.02(a): “Where there has been a bona fide attempt to advance the application and to respond…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO treat a bona fide but incomplete reply to a non-final Office action?
The USPTO may treat a bona fide but incomplete reply to a non-final Office action as complete under certain circumstances. According to MPEP 711.02(a): “A reply to a non-final Office action that is bona fide but includes an omission may be treated by the examiner as complete. See MPEP § 714.03.” This means that if…
Read More