What is the significance of the filing date in relation to the grace period?

The filing date of a patent application is crucial in determining whether a disclosure falls within the grace period and qualifies for the inventor-originated disclosure exception. According to MPEP 2153.01(a): “AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(A) first provides that a disclosure which would otherwise qualify as prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) is excepted as prior…

Read More

What are the exceptions to 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections?

What are the exceptions to 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections? There are several exceptions to 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections, which are outlined in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2). These exceptions include: Grace period disclosures: Disclosures made by the inventor or joint inventor within one year of the effective filing date. Derived disclosures:…

Read More

What is the significance of the “effective filing date” in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) exceptions?

The “effective filing date” is a crucial concept in determining the applicability of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) exceptions. As explained in MPEP 2153: “The exceptions in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) are only applicable to disclosures that occurred within the one year period before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.” The effective filing date…

Read More

When is a disclosure considered an apparent inventor-originated disclosure?

A disclosure is considered an apparent inventor-originated disclosure when certain conditions are met. According to MPEP 2153.01(a): “A disclosure is not prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) if it is apparent from the disclosure itself that it is an inventor-originated disclosure. Specifically, Office personnel may not apply a disclosure as prior art under AIA…

Read More