Why can’t examiners use interviews or examiner’s amendments to resolve minor issues after ACP in inter partes reexamination?

In inter partes reexamination, examiners cannot use interviews or examiner’s amendments to resolve minor issues after Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) due to the presence of the third party requester and procedural restrictions. MPEP 2673.01 explains: “The examiner cannot telephone the owner to obtain the minor change(s) and then issue a RAN because interviews are not…

Read More

Are interviews permitted during inter partes reexamination proceedings?

No, interviews are not permitted during inter partes reexamination proceedings. This restriction affects how examiner’s amendments are made in conjunction with a Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate (NIRC). The MPEP explicitly states: Interviews are not permitted in an inter partes reexamination proceeding (see MPEP § 2685). Thus, the examiner is not…

Read More

How are examiner’s amendments handled in inter partes reexamination proceedings?

Examiner’s amendments in inter partes reexamination proceedings are handled differently from regular patent applications due to the prohibition of interviews. Key points include: Examiner’s amendments can only be made without patent owner authorization. They must be included as a formal examiner’s amendment accompanying the Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate (NIRC). The…

Read More

Can examiners make changes to the specification without an examiner’s amendment?

Examiners are generally not permitted to make changes to the specification without an examiner’s amendment. The MPEP 1302.04 states: “No examiner’s amendment may make substantive changes to the written portions of the specification, including the abstract, without first obtaining applicant’s approval.” This restriction ensures that any significant changes to the specification are reviewed and approved…

Read More

What are the limitations on examiner’s amendments for allowed applications?

Examiner’s amendments for allowed applications have certain limitations to ensure the integrity of the patent prosecution process. According to MPEP 1302.04, some key limitations include: Substantive changes to the written portions of the specification, including the abstract, require applicant’s approval. Examiners cannot cancel claims based on an amendment that argues for certain claims and alternatively…

Read More

What is the purpose of Form PTOL-37 in the patent allowance process?

Form PTOL-37, also known as the “Notice of Allowability,” serves several important purposes in the patent allowance process: It communicates the examiner’s decision that the application is in condition for allowance. It provides a record of any examiner’s amendments made to the application. It lists any attachments or additional forms included with the Notice of…

Read More

What are examiner’s amendments in patent applications?

Examiner’s amendments are changes made to a patent application by the examiner, with the applicant’s authorization, to correct informalities or make minor adjustments. According to MPEP 1302.04, “An examiner’s amendment may be used to correct informalities in the body of the written portions of the specification as well as all errors and omissions in the…

Read More

How are examiner’s amendments handled in patent application allowance?

Examiner’s amendments play a crucial role in the patent application allowance process. Here’s how they are handled: The examiner may make amendments to put the application in condition for allowance. These amendments are made with the applicant’s approval, typically obtained through an interview. The examiner’s amendment is included in the Notice of Allowability (Form PTOL-37).…

Read More