How are ex parte reexamination proceedings conducted?

Ex parte reexamination proceedings are conducted according to 35 U.S.C. 305, which states: “reexamination will be conducted according to the procedures established for initial examination under the provisions of sections 132 and 133.” This means that the examination process follows similar procedures to the initial patent examination. Additionally, the MPEP states that “The examination will…

Read More

What is the purpose of a panel review conference in ex parte reexamination?

A panel review conference in ex parte reexamination serves several important purposes: To discuss the issuance of the final Office action To ensure the quality and consistency of the final rejection To provide additional perspectives on the examiner’s decision To confirm or revise the examiner’s preliminary decision to reject and/or allow claims MPEP § 2271…

Read More

What are the requirements for a rejection in an Office action during ex parte reexamination?

In an ex parte reexamination Office action, rejections must meet specific requirements as outlined in MPEP 2262. The key points are: Each rejection must be based on patents or printed publications. Rejections must clearly explain the reasons for rejection, citing specific sections of the references. The examiner must provide a detailed mapping of the claims…

Read More

What mailing procedures can be used for ex parte reexamination correspondence?

The MPEP outlines two primary mailing procedures that can be used for most ex parte reexamination correspondence: Certificate of Mailing and Transmission (37 CFR 1.8): This procedure can be used for filing any paper in an ex parte reexamination proceeding, except for the initial request for reexamination and a corrected/replacement request. Priority Mail Express® Mailing…

Read More