What is the difference between ex parte and inter partes reexamination?
While MPEP § 2695 doesn’t directly define the difference between ex parte and inter partes reexamination, it mentions both types in the context of reexamination of a reexamination: “…regardless of whether the reexamination certificate was issued for an ex parte reexamination or an inter partes reexamination, and regardless of whether the pending reexamination proceeding is…
Read MoreHow does the response time in ex parte reexamination differ from regular patent examination?
The response time in ex parte reexamination is generally shorter than in regular patent examination. In ex parte reexamination, MPEP 2263 specifies: “A shortened statutory period of two months will generally be set for filing a response to an Office action in an ex parte reexamination.” In contrast, regular patent examination typically allows a three-month…
Read MoreHow does ex parte reexamination differ from inter partes review?
Ex parte reexamination and inter partes review are two distinct procedures for reviewing patent validity. The key differences include: Participation: In ex parte reexamination, as described in MPEP 2209, the process is primarily between the patent owner and the USPTO. Third-party requesters have limited involvement after filing the request. In contrast, inter partes review allows…
Read MoreHow does the scope of ex parte reexamination differ from inter partes review?
How does the scope of ex parte reexamination differ from inter partes review? The scope of ex parte reexamination is more limited compared to inter partes review (IPR). Key differences include: Prior Art: Ex parte reexamination is limited to patents and printed publications, while IPR can consider a broader range of prior art. Grounds: Ex…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for a third party requester to reply in an ex parte reexamination?
According to MPEP 2251, a third party requester has two months from the date of service of the patent owner’s statement to file a reply. This time limit is set by 35 U.S.C. 304 and cannot be extended. The MPEP states: “If the patent owner files a statement in a timely manner, the third party…
Read MoreWhat happens if a submission in an ex parte reexamination is not limited to bare notice of prior or concurrent proceedings?
The USPTO has strict guidelines for submissions in ex parte reexamination proceedings. If a submission goes beyond providing bare notice of prior or concurrent proceedings, it may be rejected. The MPEP states: “Where a submission is not limited to bare notice of the prior or concurrent proceedings (in which a patent undergoing reexamination is or…
Read MoreWhat is the standard response time for an Office action in ex parte reexamination?
The standard response time for an Office action in ex parte reexamination is typically two months. This is specified in MPEP 2263, which states: “A shortened statutory period of two months will generally be set for filing a response to an Office action in an ex parte reexamination.” This shortened period is designed to expedite…
Read MoreCan the response time for an ex parte reexamination Office action be extended?
Yes, the response time for an ex parte reexamination Office action can be extended. According to MPEP 2263: “An extension of time may be requested under 37 CFR 1.550(c).” This means that patent owners or their representatives can file a request for an extension of time if they need additional time to respond to the…
Read MoreWhat are the rules for responding to Office actions in ex parte reexamination proceedings?
In ex parte reexamination proceedings, the rules for responding to Office actions are governed by 37 CFR 1.550(a) and 37 CFR 1.111. Key points include: Patent owners are typically given 2 months to respond to an Office action. Extensions of time are only available under 37 CFR 1.550(c). The certificate of mailing, certificate of transmission,…
Read MoreWhat is the deadline for filing responses in ex parte reexamination?
The deadline for filing responses in ex parte reexamination is set by 37 CFR 1.530 for patent owners and 37 CFR 1.535 for reexamination requesters. As stated in MPEP 2252, “The failure to timely file or serve the documents set forth in § 1.530 or in § 1.535 may result in their being refused consideration.”…
Read More