What are the requirements for submitting prior art after the Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (NIRC)?

Submitting prior art after the Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (NIRC) requires meeting specific conditions due to the statutory mandate for “special dispatch” in reexamination proceedings. The MPEP states: “[T]he submission must be accompanied by (A) a factual accounting providing a sufficient explanation of why the information submitted could not have…

Read More

What sources of prior art must an examiner consider during ex parte reexamination?

During ex parte reexamination, an examiner must consider several sources of prior art, including: Patents and printed publications cited in the reexamination request Prior art cited by other reexamination requesters Prior art cited in the patent owner’s statement or requester’s reply Prior art cited by the patent owner under duty of disclosure Prior art discovered…

Read More

How does the degree of consideration for submitted prior art differ in ex parte reexamination?

In ex parte reexamination, the degree of consideration given to submitted prior art depends on how the information is presented. The MPEP states: “Where patents, publications, and other such documents are submitted by a party (patent owner or requester) in compliance with the requirements of the rules, the requisite degree of consideration to be given…

Read More

Can previously considered art raise a substantial new question of patentability?

Yes, previously considered art can raise a substantial new question of patentability under certain circumstances. The MPEP 2216 clarifies: “The substantial new question of patentability may be based on art previously considered by the Office if the reference is presented in a new light or a different way that escaped review during earlier examination.” This…

Read More