Who has the duty to disclose information material to patentability?
According to 37 CFR 1.56(c), the duty to disclose information material to patentability applies to: Each inventor named in the application Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the application Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application and who is associated with the inventor, the applicant,…
Read MoreWho has a duty to disclose information material to patentability?
According to 37 CFR 1.56, individuals associated with the filing and prosecution of a patent application have a duty to disclose information material to patentability. This includes: The inventor(s) Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the application Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application The…
Read MoreWhat is considered ‘substantive involvement’ in a patent application?
The MPEP doesn’t provide a precise definition of ‘substantive involvement’, but it does offer guidance on who is considered substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of a patent application. According to 37 CFR 1.56(c), this includes: “Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application and who is…
Read MoreAre inventors always subject to the duty to disclose?
Yes, inventors are always subject to the duty to disclose information material to patentability. The MPEP, citing 37 CFR 1.56(c), explicitly states that individuals associated with the filing or prosecution of a patent application include: “(1) Each inventor named in the application” This means that every inventor listed on a patent application has a duty…
Read MoreWhat is the extent of information disclosure required under 37 CFR 1.56(a)?
What is the extent of information disclosure required under 37 CFR 1.56(a)? Under 37 CFR 1.56(a), the duty to disclose information extends to “all information known to be material to patentability.” The MPEP clarifies this by stating: “The duty to disclose all information known to be material to patentability is deemed to be satisfied if…
Read MoreWhat are the Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) requirements for international design applications?
Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) requirements for international design applications designating the United States are similar to those for domestic national applications: The duty to disclose information material to patentability applies to individuals associated with the filing and prosecution of the application. An IDS must adhere to the requirements set forth in 37 CFR 1.97, 1.98,…
Read MoreHow is the duty to disclose fulfilled in a patent application?
The duty to disclose is typically fulfilled by submitting an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) to the USPTO. This document lists all known prior art and other information material to patentability. The process involves: Identifying relevant information Preparing the IDS form Submitting the IDS along with copies of non-U.S. patent documents Paying any required fees The…
Read MoreCan the actions of individuals affect the rights of their employer in patent matters?
Yes, the actions of individuals can affect the rights of their employer in patent matters. The MPEP explicitly states: “However, it would apply to individuals within the corporation or institution who were substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application, and actions by such individuals may affect the rights of the corporation or…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between the duty to disclose under 37 CFR 1.56 and the requirements for information under 37 CFR 1.105?
The main differences are: Under 37 CFR 1.56, individuals associated with a patent application have a duty to disclose information material to patentability on their own initiative. Under 37 CFR 1.105, examiners can require information reasonably necessary for examination from parties identified in 37 CFR 1.56. The materiality threshold for 37 CFR 1.56 is higher…
Read MoreHow does the duty to disclose apply in reexamination proceedings?
The duty to disclose in reexamination proceedings is similar to that in patent applications, but applies to a slightly different group of individuals. According to the MPEP, for reexamination proceedings, the duty applies to: “the patent owner, each attorney or agent who represents the patent owner, and every other individual who is substantively involved on…
Read More