What is the Duty of Disclosure in patent law?
The Duty of Disclosure is a fundamental obligation in patent law that requires patent applicants and their representatives to disclose all known material information to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) during the patent application process. This duty is outlined in MPEP 2000. The purpose of this duty is to ensure that the…
Read MoreWhat is the duty of disclosure in patent applications?
The duty of disclosure is a fundamental obligation in patent law, as outlined in 37 CFR 1.56. It requires that: “Each individual associated with the filing and prosecution of a patent application has a duty of candor and good faith in dealing with the Office, which includes a duty to disclose to the Office all…
Read MoreWhat is the duty of disclosure in international design applications designating the United States?
The duty of disclosure in international design applications designating the United States is similar to that of domestic national applications. According to MPEP 2920.05(f), “the duty to disclose information material to patentability as defined in 37 CFR 1.56 is placed on individuals associated with the filing and prosecution of an international design application designating the…
Read MoreHow does the duty of disclosure relate to patent enforceability?
The duty of disclosure is closely tied to patent enforceability. According to MPEP 2016, a violation of the duty of disclosure can lead to all claims in a patent being unenforceable. The section states: “A finding of ‘fraud,’ ‘inequitable conduct,’ or violation of duty of disclosure with respect to any claim in an application or…
Read MoreWhat should be considered when dealing with foreign applicants or applications?
When dealing with foreign applicants or applications: Ensure foreign clients understand the requirements of the duty of disclosure Review information disclosure statements from foreign applicants carefully Be cautious with translations and partial disclosures of foreign references Consider prior art cited in corresponding foreign applications MPEP 2004 states: “It is also important that an attorney or…
Read MoreWhat is the duty of disclosure regarding prior art cited in related foreign applications?
Applicants and other individuals involved in patent prosecution have a duty to bring to the attention of the USPTO any material prior art or other information cited or brought to their attention in any related foreign application. This duty is outlined in MPEP 2001.06(a) and 37 CFR 1.56. The MPEP states: “The inference that such…
Read MoreWhat is the duty of disclosure in ex parte reexamination proceedings?
The duty of disclosure in ex parte reexamination proceedings filed under 35 U.S.C. 302 applies to the patent owner, attorneys or agents representing the patent owner, and individuals substantively involved on behalf of the patent owner. This duty requires disclosing all information known to be material to patentability. As stated in MPEP 2280: “The continuing…
Read MoreWhat is the duty of disclosure regarding copending U.S. patent applications?
What is the duty of disclosure regarding copending U.S. patent applications? The duty of disclosure regarding copending U.S. patent applications is outlined in MPEP 2001.06(b). It states: “The individuals covered by 37 CFR 1.56 have a duty to bring to the attention of the examiner, or other Office official involved with the examination of a…
Read MoreWhat is the duty of disclosure regarding copending United States patent applications?
Individuals covered by 37 CFR 1.56 have a duty to bring to the attention of the examiner information about other copending United States applications that are “material to patentability” of the application in question. This includes: Providing identification of pending or abandoned applications filed by at least one of the inventors Applications assigned to the…
Read MoreDoes the duty of disclosure apply to continuation-in-part applications?
Yes, the duty of disclosure applies to continuation-in-part (CIP) applications. The MPEP specifically addresses this situation: “In a continuation-in-part application, individuals covered by 37 CFR 1.56 have a duty to disclose to the Office all information known to be material to patentability which became available between the filing date of the prior application and the…
Read More