Can a protestor petition the Director against an examiner’s adverse decision?

No, a protestor cannot petition the Director against an examiner’s adverse decision. MPEP § 1906 clearly states that under the restricted protestor participation permitted by 37 CFR 1.291(d), an examiner’s adverse decision “is not petitionable to the Director.” This limitation is part of the overall restrictions on protestor involvement in the patent examination process. To…

Read More

What is a remand in patent examination?

A remand in patent examination is when the Director or the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) returns a case to the examiner for further consideration. According to MPEP 1211, “Both the Director and the Board have the authority to remand a case to the examiner when necessary.” This process allows for additional review…

Read More

Who has the authority to decide petitions to the Director of the USPTO?

According to MPEP 1002.02, various officials have been delegated authority to decide different types of petitions to the Director of the USPTO. For example: The Deputy Commissioner for Patents who oversees the Office of Petitions decides many types of petitions, including petitions to revive abandoned applications and petitions for unintentionally delayed priority claims. Technology Center…

Read More

What should be included in a petition to the USPTO Director?

A well-prepared petition to the USPTO Director should include several key elements: A clear statement of the relief requested The facts and circumstances supporting the petition The legal basis for the requested relief Any evidence supporting the petition The appropriate petition fee, if required It’s important to note that 37 CFR 1.4(c) requires a separate…

Read More