What is the significance of the “no new matter” statement for sequence listing corrections?

The “no new matter” statement is crucial when submitting corrected sequence listings, as mentioned in MPEP 2422.07. Here’s why it’s significant: It ensures that the corrections to the sequence listing do not introduce new subject matter into the application. New matter is prohibited in patent applications after the filing date, as it could potentially extend…

Read More

What is the process for refusing the effects of a correction in the International Register?

What is the process for refusing the effects of a correction in the International Register? The process for refusing the effects of a correction in the International Register is as follows: The International Bureau (IB) notifies designated Contracting Parties of any correction to the International Register. Designated offices have the right to declare that they…

Read More

What happens if there are irregularities in an international design application?

If the International Bureau finds irregularities in an international design application, the following process occurs: The International Bureau will invite the applicant to make required corrections within three months from the date of the invitation. If the irregularity is one that affects the filing date (as prescribed in Rule 14(2)), the filing date will be…

Read More

How are corrections handled in pending nonprovisional international design applications?

The USPTO handles corrections in pending nonprovisional international design applications on a case-by-case basis. According to MPEP 2930: “The effects of any correction in the International Register by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 22 in a pending nonprovisional international design application shall be decided by the Office in accordance with the merits of each…

Read More

How are corrections handled for issued U.S. patents from international design applications?

For U.S. patents issued from international design applications, corrections are handled according to U.S. patent law, not the Hague Agreement procedures. As stated in MPEP 2930: “A patent issuing from an international design application may only be corrected in accordance with the provisions of title 35, United States Code, for correcting patents.” This means that…

Read More

How are corrections to the International Register handled?

How are corrections to the International Register handled? Corrections to the International Register are handled as follows: The International Bureau (IB) may correct any error in the International Register. Corrections may be made ex officio or at the request of the holder. The IB notifies the holder and the offices of designated Contracting Parties of…

Read More

How are corrections handled for abandoned nonprovisional international design applications?

For abandoned nonprovisional international design applications, corrections are generally not acted upon by the USPTO. As stated in MPEP 2930: “Corrections under Rule 22 received in abandoned applications will generally not be acted upon by the Office and will not be given effect unless otherwise indicated by the Office.” This means that once an application…

Read More

Can corrections be made to sequence listings after filing?

Corrections to sequence listings are subject to strict rules regarding the introduction of new matter. According to MPEP 2422.07: “The correction of errors in sequencing or any other errors that are made in describing an invention are subject to the statutory prohibition (35 U.S.C. 132 and 35 U.S.C. 251) against the introduction of new matter.”…

Read More