How does the USPTO handle concurrent reexamination and interference proceedings?
When reexamination and interference proceedings are concurrent, the USPTO follows specific guidelines to manage both processes. According to MPEP 2686.04: “If a reexamination proceeding is ordered while an interference proceeding is pending, the reexamination proceeding is suspended until the interference proceeding is terminated at the interference level (i.e., the interference is terminated as to the…
Read MoreWhat is the timeframe for notifying the USPTO of concurrent proceedings in reexamination?
The timeframe for notifying the USPTO of concurrent proceedings during reexamination is specified in 37 CFR 1.985. According to MPEP 2282: “37 CFR 1.985 requires a patent owner to notify the Office of any prior or concurrent proceedings in which the patent is or was involved.” While the specific timeframe is not mentioned in MPEP…
Read MoreCan a third party requester petition to merge a reexamination proceeding with a reissue application?
A third party requester does not have the right to petition for the merger of a reexamination proceeding with a reissue application. The MPEP clearly states: The third party requester does not have a right to file a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 to merge a reexamination proceeding and a reissue application examination, since a…
Read MoreCan a third-party requester petition to merge multiple reexamination proceedings?
A third-party requester generally does not have the right to petition for merging multiple reexamination proceedings. According to MPEP § 2283: “The third party requester of a reexamination proceeding (reexamination # 1) does not have a right to file a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 to merge that reexamination proceeding with another reexamination proceeding (reexamination…
Read MoreCan a third party requester petition to merge a reissue application and an inter partes reexamination proceeding?
No, a third party requester does not have the right to file a petition to merge a reissue application and an inter partes reexamination proceeding. The MPEP clearly states: “The third party requester does not have a right to file a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 to merge a reexamination proceeding and a reissue application…
Read MoreWhat is the patent owner’s responsibility regarding prior or concurrent proceedings in ex parte reexamination?
In an ex parte reexamination proceeding, the patent owner has a continuing responsibility to inform the USPTO about any prior or concurrent proceedings involving the patent under reexamination. This responsibility is outlined in 37 CFR 1.565(a), which states: “In an ex parte reexamination proceeding before the Office, the patent owner must inform the Office of…
Read MoreWhat information must patent owners provide regarding prior or concurrent proceedings?
According to MPEP 2686, patent owners are required to provide the Office with information about any prior or concurrent proceedings involving the patent undergoing inter partes reexamination, as well as the results of such proceedings, if known. The MPEP states: “In accordance with 37 CFR 1.985, the patent owner is required to provide the Office…
Read MoreWhat are the responsibilities of parties regarding litigation in inter partes reexamination?
In inter partes reexamination proceedings, both the patent owner and the third-party requester have responsibilities regarding litigation. The MPEP states: The patent owner is reminded of the continuing responsibility under 37 CFR 1.985(a), to apprise the Office of any litigation activity, or other prior or concurrent proceeding, involving Patent 9,999,999 throughout the course of this…
Read MoreWhat happens if a submission in an ex parte reexamination is not limited to bare notice of prior or concurrent proceedings?
The USPTO has strict guidelines for submissions in ex parte reexamination proceedings. If a submission goes beyond providing bare notice of prior or concurrent proceedings, it may be rejected. The MPEP states: “Where a submission is not limited to bare notice of the prior or concurrent proceedings (in which a patent undergoing reexamination is or…
Read MoreWhat happens when a patent in ex parte reexamination becomes involved in an interference?
When a patent undergoing ex parte reexamination becomes involved in an interference proceeding, the general policy of the USPTO is to continue both proceedings concurrently. As stated in the MPEP, “The general policy of the Office is that a reexamination proceeding will not be delayed, or stayed, because of an interference or the possibility of…
Read More