How does the written description requirement apply to biological deposits in patent applications?
The written description requirement, as applied to biological deposits in patent applications, is based on 35 U.S.C. 112(a). According to MPEP 2411.01: “A rejection for lack of written description typically arises in the context that the application as filed does not contain a description to support an amendment to the specification or claims, although it…
Read MoreWhen might an applicant need to replace a biological deposit?
An applicant might need to replace a biological deposit when the original deposit is no longer viable. According to the MPEP, “Replacement will typically take place where the earlier deposit is no longer viable.” This could occur if the deposited material has degraded, lost its ability to replicate, or become contaminated to the point where…
Read MoreWhat information must be included in a viability statement for non-Budapest Treaty deposits?
For biological material deposits not made under the Budapest Treaty, a viability statement must be filed with the patent application. According to MPEP 2409 and 37 CFR 1.807(b), this statement must contain: The name and address of the depository The name and address of the depositor The date of deposit The identity of the deposit…
Read MoreWhat is the viability requirement for biological material deposits in patent applications?
According to MPEP 2409, the viability requirement for biological material deposits is essentially a requirement that the deposited material is capable of reproduction. This is outlined in 37 CFR 1.807(a), which states: “A deposit of biological material that is capable of self-replication either directly or indirectly must be viable at the time of deposit and…
Read MoreWhat constitutes ‘undue experimentation’ in the context of biological material deposits?
‘Undue experimentation’ in the context of biological material deposits refers to procedures that require excessive effort or resources beyond what is considered routine in the field. According to MPEP 2404.02: “Deposits may be required to support the claims if an isolation procedure requires undue experimentation to obtain the desired biological material.” This means that if…
Read MoreHow does “supplement” differ from “replacement” in biological deposits?
While “replacement” involves substituting one deposit for another, “supplement” refers to situations where the original deposit is still viable but has lost certain qualities. The MPEP explains: “The term ‘supplement’ is directed to those situations where the earlier deposit is still viable in the sense that it is alive and capable of replication either directly…
Read MoreDo applicants need to specify the term of deposit if it’s made under the Budapest Treaty?
Yes, applicants need to specify the term of deposit even if it’s made under the Budapest Treaty. The MPEP clearly states: Unless applicant indicates that the deposit has been made under the Budapest Treaty, applicant must indicate the term for which the deposit has been made. This means that if the deposit is not explicitly…
Read MoreWhat is the required term of deposit for biological materials in patent applications?
According to 37 CFR 1.806, the term of deposit for biological materials in patent applications must be: At least thirty (30) years from the date of deposit, and At least five (5) years after the most recent request for a sample was received by the depository. The MPEP states: A deposit made before or during…
Read MoreIs there a difference in replacing deposits during patent application versus after grant?
Yes, there is a difference in the flexibility allowed for replacing deposits during the patent application process compared to after the patent has been granted. The MPEP notes: “An applicant may have greater latitude in replacing a deposit during the pendency of an application than after the patent is granted.” This suggests that applicants have…
Read MoreWhen is a replacement deposit not required for biological materials?
A replacement deposit of biological materials is not required under certain conditions, even if the depository cannot furnish samples to requesters outside its jurisdiction. According to MPEP 2407.05, these conditions are: National security reasons Health reasons Environmental safety reasons As stated in the MPEP: “The provisions of 37 CFR 1.805(h) indicate that a replacement deposit…
Read More