What is the difference between claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and 35 U.S.C. 120?

The main differences between claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and 35 U.S.C. 120 are: 35 U.S.C. 119(e): Used for claiming benefit of a provisional application Does not require specifying the relationship between applications Example: “This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/123,456, filed January 1, 2020.” 35 U.S.C. 120: Used for…

Read More

Can a divisional application claim benefit from a provisional application?

Can a divisional application claim benefit from a provisional application? Yes, a divisional application can claim benefit from a provisional application through its parent application. The MPEP 201.06 states: “A later-filed application may be filed as a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part of a prior nonprovisional application or international application designating the United States. Unless the…

Read More

Can a divisional or continuation application claim benefit from multiple prior applications?

Yes, a divisional or continuation application can claim benefit from multiple prior applications. The MPEP 201.06(c) states: ‘A continuation or divisional application may be filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) using the procedures set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(b), by providing: (A) a copy of the prior application as filed; and (B) a new specification, claim…

Read More

What is the benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) for international design applications?

Under 35 U.S.C. 386(c), an international design application designating the United States can claim the benefit of the filing date of a prior nonprovisional application, international application (PCT) designating the United States, or international design application designating the United States. Conversely, a nonprovisional application can claim the benefit of a prior international design application designating…

Read More

What happens if a prior-filed application is abandoned?

What happens if a prior-filed application is abandoned? If a prior-filed application is abandoned, it may still be used to claim the benefit of priority for a later-filed application, provided certain conditions are met. According to MPEP 211.01: ‘An abandoned application may be used as a prior application for purposes of claiming benefit under 35…

Read More

What is the legal basis for claiming the benefit of an international design application designating the United States?

The legal basis for claiming the benefit of an international design application designating the United States is found in 35 U.S.C. 386(c). This statute allows a nonprovisional application to claim the benefit of a prior international design application, subject to the conditions and requirements of 35 U.S.C. 120. As stated in the MPEP: Pursuant to…

Read More

Can a nonprovisional application claim benefit from a provisional application filed without an English translation?

Can a nonprovisional application claim benefit from a provisional application filed without an English translation? Yes, a nonprovisional application can claim the benefit of a provisional application filed without an English translation, but there are specific requirements. According to MPEP 601.01(a): If the provisional application was filed in a language other than English, an English-language…

Read More