How does the USPTO treat admissions under the AIA?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) continues to treat admissions by applicants as prior art under the America Invents Act (AIA). This approach is consistent with pre-AIA practice. According to MPEP 2152.03: “The Office will continue to treat admissions by the applicant as prior art under the AIA.” This means that any statement…

Read More

What precautions should patent applicants take regarding admissions in their applications?

Patent applicants should be cautious when making statements in their applications to avoid unintentional admissions of prior art. Based on the guidance in MPEP 2129, here are some precautions applicants should take: Be precise in language: Avoid characterizing your own work or others’ work as “prior art” unless you intend it to be treated as…

Read More

How does the MPEP address the use of admissions for both anticipation and obviousness?

The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) addresses the use of admissions for both anticipation and obviousness determinations. MPEP 2129 states: “A statement by an applicant in the specification or made during prosecution identifying the work of another as ‘prior art’ is an admission which can be relied upon for both anticipation and obviousness determinations.”…

Read More

What is the difference between FITF and pre-AIA applications regarding admissions?

The treatment of admissions differs between applications subject to the First Inventor to File (FITF) provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) and pre-AIA applications. MPEP 2152.03 specifically notes: “[Editor Note: This MPEP section is only applicable to applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file (FITF) provisions of the AIA as set…

Read More

What is the difference between admissions and mere arguments in patent examination?

In patent examination, there is a crucial distinction between admissions and mere arguments. MPEP 2129 provides guidance on this matter: “Mere arguments or statements that a reference is not prior art are not admissions that it is prior art.” This distinction is important because: Admissions are statements that acknowledge certain information as prior art and…

Read More

What are admissions in patent law?

In patent law, admissions refer to statements made by an applicant in the specification or during prosecution that identify the work of another as “prior art.” These admissions can be used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as prior art for both anticipation and obviousness determinations. As stated in MPEP 2152.03: “A…

Read More

How do admissions affect anticipation and obviousness determinations?

Admissions by an applicant can significantly impact both anticipation and obviousness determinations in patent examination. As stated in MPEP 2152.03: “A statement by an applicant in the specification or made during prosecution identifying the work of another as ‘prior art’ is an admission which can be relied upon for both anticipation and obviousness determinations, regardless…

Read More