What happens if I don’t properly respond to a biological material deposit rejection?
If you don’t properly respond to a rejection based on a biological material deposit issue, your application may be abandoned. The MPEP 2411.02 clearly states: “Other replies to such a rejection by the examiner shall be considered nonresponsive and may result in abandonment of the application.” It’s crucial to address the rejection by either making…
Read MoreWhat is the impact of amendments under 37 CFR 1.116 or 41.33 on new grounds of rejection?
Amendments submitted under 37 CFR 1.116 or 41.33 can affect whether a rejection in an examiner’s answer is considered a new ground of rejection. According to MPEP 1207.03(a): If: An amendment under 37 CFR 1.116 or 41.33 proposes to add or amend one or more claims; The applicant was advised (through an advisory action) that…
Read MoreHow does 37 CFR 1.116 affect the entry of amendments after final rejection?
37 CFR 1.116 governs the entry of amendments after final rejection in patent applications. Key points include: Amendments may be made of right within the time period for reply. Amendments may be admitted upon a showing of good and sufficient reasons. No amendment may be made in an application after the mailing of the notice…
Read More