What is an applicant suggestion for interference?
An applicant suggestion for interference is a process where an applicant, including a reissue applicant, suggests an interference with another application or patent. This is outlined in 37 CFR 41.202, which states: “An applicant, including a reissue applicant, may suggest an interference with another application or a patent.” The suggestion must meet specific requirements, including…
Read MoreWhat happens to other USPTO proceedings during an interference?
When an interference is initiated, other proceedings within the USPTO for the involved file are generally suspended. The MPEP 2307 clearly states: “Other proceedings for the involved file within the Office are suspended except as the Board may order.” This suspension ensures that the Board has exclusive control over the involved file during the interference.…
Read MoreHow are NASA and DoE ownership contests handled by the USPTO?
NASA and DoE ownership contests are handled by the USPTO using procedures similar to patent interferences. The MPEP 2309 states: “Although these cases are not interferences, the interference practices in this chapter generally apply to NASA and DoE ownership contests as well.” The process involves collaboration between various USPTO departments: The examiner works in coordination…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle paper files in the interference process?
The USPTO has transitioned most application files to the Image File Wrapper (IFW) system, but some older files may still exist in paper form. The MPEP 2304.01(b) addresses this issue: “Although the official records for most applications have been converted into Image File Wrapper (IFW) files, some records exist only in paper form, particularly older…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle applications not under secrecy orders that interfere with applications under secrecy orders?
The USPTO has a specific procedure for handling applications not under secrecy orders that interfere with applications under secrecy orders. According to MPEP 2306: “If an application not under a secrecy order has allowable claims that interfere with allowable claims of an application that is under a secrecy order, then the application that is not…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle fees for copies of records in contested cases?
The USPTO has specific requirements for fees related to copies of records in contested cases. According to MPEP 2307.02: “Any request from a party for access to or copies of Office records directly related to a contested case must be filed with the Board. The request must precisely identify the records and in the case…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if subject matter is interfering?
The USPTO determines if subject matter is interfering by examining the claims of different applications or patents. According to MPEP 2301.03: An interference exists if the subject matter of a claim of one party would, if prior art, have anticipated or rendered obvious the subject matter of a claim of the opposing party and vice…
Read MoreWhere can I find information about derivation proceedings at the USPTO?
The MPEP 2314 provides guidance on where to find information about derivation proceedings at the USPTO. It states: “For further information, see 37 CFR part 42, subpart E; see also the Board’s Patent Trial Practice Guide available at www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing-patent-decisions/resources/board-trial-rules-and-practice.” To learn more about derivation proceedings, you should consult: The Code of Federal Regulations (37 CFR…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine whether to institute a derivation proceeding?
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) follows specific criteria to determine whether to institute a derivation proceeding. According to MPEP 2310: “The petition, and any supplemental information filed, will be reviewed to determine whether they set forth a basis for instituting a derivation proceeding.“ The USPTO considers several factors, including: Whether the petition is…
Read MoreWhat types of patent proceedings can the Board assume jurisdiction over?
The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) has broad authority to assume jurisdiction over various types of patent proceedings. According to MPEP 2312, the Board can take control of: Regular patent applications Reexamination proceedings Reissue applications Issued patents with derivation petitions The MPEP specifically states: “The Board may assume jurisdiction of any application, including…
Read More