What is the timeframe for filing a notice of appeal in ex parte reexamination?
The timeframe for filing a notice of appeal in ex parte reexamination is typically two months from the date of the last Office action. According to MPEP 2273, “The period for filing the notice of appeal is the period set for response in the last Office action which is normally 2 months.” However, the MPEP…
Read MoreCan third-party requesters participate in appeals during ex parte reexamination?
No, third-party requesters cannot participate in appeals during ex parte reexamination. The MPEP 2273 explicitly states: “A third party requester may not appeal, and may not participate in the patent owner’s appeal.” This limitation is a key feature of ex parte reexamination proceedings, distinguishing them from inter partes reviews where third parties have more extensive…
Read MoreCan a patentability decision favoring the patentee be reviewed in ex parte reexamination?
No, a patentability decision favoring the patentee cannot be reviewed in ex parte reexamination. The MPEP 2273 clearly states: “The reexamination statute does not provide for review of a patentability decision favoring the patentee.” This principle is supported by case law, specifically “Greenwood v. Seiko Instruments, 8 USPQ2d 1455 (D.D.C. 1988).” This limitation is an…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for a proper appeal in ex parte reexamination?
The requirements for a proper appeal in ex parte reexamination are similar to those in regular patent prosecution, with some specific considerations. According to MPEP 2273, “The normal ex parte appeal procedures set forth at 37 CFR 41.31 through 37 CFR 41.54 apply in ex parte reexamination, except as pointed out in this Chapter.” Key…
Read MoreWhat are the appeal rights for patent owners in ex parte reexamination?
Patent owners have specific appeal rights in ex parte reexamination proceedings. According to MPEP 2273, “The patent owner involved in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter may appeal under the provisions of section 134, and may seek court review under the provisions of sections 141 to 144, with respect to any decision adverse to the…
Read MoreCan new grounds of rejection be introduced in an examiner’s answer during ex parte reexamination?
Yes, new grounds of rejection can be introduced in an examiner’s answer during ex parte reexamination. According to MPEP 2273: “The examiner may, however, include in the examiner’s answer a new ground of rejection, in which case appellant would have the right to amend the claims, or take other appropriate action under 37 CFR 41.39(a)(2).”…
Read MoreWhat is the process for filing a notice of appeal in ex parte reexamination?
The process for filing a notice of appeal in ex parte reexamination is outlined in MPEP 2273. Here are the key steps: File the notice of appeal: Submit the notice of appeal to the USPTO, accompanied by the fee set forth in 37 CFR 41.20(b)(1). Include required parts: The notice of appeal should include: A…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for filing an appeal in ex parte reexamination?
In ex parte reexamination, the time limit for filing an appeal is set by MPEP 2273, which states: “The appeal need not be filed within the two-month period for response to the action from which the appeal was taken, as is required by 37 CFR 1.134 and 37 CFR 1.136 for an amendment to overcome…
Read MoreWhat happens if a notice of appeal is defective in ex parte reexamination?
If a notice of appeal is defective in ex parte reexamination, the patent owner will be notified and given an opportunity to cure the defect(s). The MPEP 2273 states: “Where a notice of appeal is defective, the patent owner will be so notified. In third party requested reexaminations, Form PTOL-475 will be used to provide…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of not filing a timely notice of appeal in ex parte reexamination?
If a patent owner fails to file a timely notice of appeal or does not pay the appropriate appeal fee in ex parte reexamination, there are significant consequences. According to MPEP 2273, “If the patent owner does not timely file a notice of appeal and/or does not timely file the appropriate appeal fee, the patent…
Read More