Can a third party requester file a reply if the patent owner doesn’t file a statement?
No, a third party requester cannot file a reply if the patent owner does not file a statement in an ex parte reexamination. MPEP 2251 clearly states: “If the patent owner does not file a statement under § 1.530, no reply or other submission from the ex parte reexamination requester will be considered.” This rule…
Read MoreWhat are the service requirements for a third party requester’s reply in ex parte reexamination?
In ex parte reexamination, the third party requester must serve a copy of their reply on the patent owner. MPEP 2251 states: “Any reply by the ex parte requester must be served upon the patent owner in accordance with § 1.248.” Additionally, the MPEP directs readers to MPEP § 2266.03 for further details on service…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for a third-party requester’s reply in ex parte reexamination?
According to MPEP 2254, a third-party requester has specific requirements for filing a reply in ex parte reexamination: The reply must be filed within two months of the date of service of the patent owner’s statement. The reply is limited to issues raised in the patent owner’s statement. No new prior art may be introduced…
Read MoreWhat can a third party requester include in their reply during ex parte reexamination?
According to MPEP 2251, a third party requester’s reply in an ex parte reexamination can be quite comprehensive. The MPEP states: “The reply need not be limited to the issues raised in the statement. The reply may include additional prior art patents and printed publications and may raise any issue appropriate for reexamination.” This means…
Read MoreHow are third-party requester replies considered in reexamination?
In a reexamination proceeding, the examiner must consider replies submitted by third-party requesters. MPEP 2253 provides guidance on this matter: “As to consideration of a reply by a third party requester, the examiner will be guided by 37 CFR 1.535.“ This means that the examiner will follow the rules set forth in 37 CFR 1.535…
Read MoreCan a third party requester petition to merge a reexamination proceeding with a reissue application?
A third party requester does not have the right to petition for the merger of a reexamination proceeding with a reissue application. The MPEP clearly states: The third party requester does not have a right to file a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 to merge a reexamination proceeding and a reissue application examination, since a…
Read MoreCan a third-party requester petition to merge multiple reexamination proceedings?
A third-party requester generally does not have the right to petition for merging multiple reexamination proceedings. According to MPEP § 2283: “The third party requester of a reexamination proceeding (reexamination # 1) does not have a right to file a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 to merge that reexamination proceeding with another reexamination proceeding (reexamination…
Read MoreCan third-party requesters participate in ex parte reexamination interviews?
No, third-party requesters are not permitted to participate in ex parte reexamination interviews. MPEP 2281 clearly states: “Requests that reexamination requesters participate in interviews with examiners will not be granted.“ This restriction is in place to maintain the ex parte nature of the reexamination proceedings. Only the patent owner and/or their representative can participate in…
Read MoreHow are third-party requesters notified of Office actions in ex parte reexamination?
In ex parte reexamination proceedings involving third-party requesters, the USPTO ensures that they receive copies of all Office actions. According to MPEP 2264: “All actions in a third party requester ex parte reexamination will have a copy mailed to the third party requester. A transmittal form PTOL-465 must be used in providing the third party…
Read MoreCan a third party requester intervene in court review of a reexamination decision?
While third party requesters cannot directly appeal reexamination decisions, they may be allowed to intervene in court reviews under certain circumstances. The MPEP 2279 states: “While the reexamination statutory provisions do not provide for participation by any third party requester during any court review, the courts have permitted intervention by a third party requester in…
Read More