What form is used to communicate the reasons for patentability in ex parte reexamination?

In ex parte reexamination proceedings, the USPTO uses a specific form to communicate the reasons for patentability or confirmation of patent claims. According to MPEP 2296, this form is: PTOL-476: Reasons for Patentability/Confirmation The PTOL-476 form is used by examiners to explain why certain claims in the patent under reexamination are deemed patentable or why…

Read More

What happens if a patent owner files a request for continued examination (RCE) in a merged proceeding?

When a patent owner files a request for continued examination (RCE) in a merged reissue and reexamination proceeding, it has significant consequences. The MPEP states: If applicant/patent owner files a request for continued examination (RCE) of the reissue application under 37 CFR 1.114 (which may be filed on or after May 29, 2000 for an…

Read More

What is the purpose of submitting written statements in patent reexamination proceedings?

The purpose of submitting written statements in patent reexamination proceedings is to provide additional context or explanation related to prior art citations. According to MPEP 2202: “The written statement should be directed to the pertinence of the cited prior art.” These statements can help clarify the relevance of cited prior art to the patent under…

Read More

What is the purpose of the “substantial new question of patentability” requirement in reexamination?

The “substantial new question of patentability” requirement serves to protect patentees from unnecessary reexaminations. MPEP 2244 explains: “The substantial new question of patentability requirement protects patentees from having to respond to, or participate in unjustified reexaminations.” This requirement ensures that reexaminations are only conducted when there is a legitimate basis for questioning the validity of…

Read More

What is the purpose of the requester’s reply in ex parte reexamination?

The requester’s reply in ex parte reexamination serves to address the patent owner’s statement and provide additional arguments for reexamination. According to MPEP 2252: “The reply by the requester should be limited to issues raised by the patent owner’s statement.” The purpose of the requester’s reply is to: Respond to arguments made by the patent…

Read More

What is the purpose of ex parte reexamination?

The purpose of ex parte reexamination is to provide a mechanism for the USPTO to review the validity of an issued patent. According to MPEP 2209, “Ex parte reexamination is a patent office proceeding which provides a complete reexamination of the patent claims on the basis of prior art patents and printed publications.” This process…

Read More