What is the role of “specific and substantial utility” in patent applications?
“Specific and substantial utility” is a crucial concept in patent law that determines the patentability of an invention. The MPEP 2107.01 states: “Courts have used the labels “practical utility,” “substantial utility,” or “specific utility” to refer to this aspect of the “useful invention” requirement of 35 U.S.C. 101. The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals…
Read MoreHow does a specific example in prior art anticipate a claimed range?
A specific example in prior art can anticipate a claimed range if it falls within that range. This is based on the principle that disclosing a species (specific example) anticipates a genus (range) that includes that species. The MPEP 2131.03 provides an illustrative example: “Claims to titanium (Ti) alloy with 0.6-0.9% nickel (Ni) and 0.2-0.4%…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the species-genus relationship in prior public disclosures?
The species-genus relationship is significant in prior public disclosures because a prior disclosure of a species by an inventor can be considered the same subject matter as a later disclosure of a genus that includes that species by a third party. This principle is illustrated in Example 2 of MPEP 2155.02, which states: Note that…
Read MoreWhat is the “species-anticipates-genus” rule in patent examination?
What is the “species-anticipates-genus” rule in patent examination? The “species-anticipates-genus” rule is a fundamental principle in patent examination, particularly relevant when dealing with prior art disclosures. This rule is outlined in MPEP 2131.02 and states that a species will anticipate a claim to a genus. The MPEP explicitly states: “A generic claim cannot be allowed…
Read MoreHow does the “species anticipates genus” principle apply in patent law?
The “species anticipates genus” principle is a fundamental concept in patent law, particularly in anticipation analysis. According to MPEP 2131.02, “A generic claim cannot be allowed to an applicant if the prior art discloses a species falling within the claimed genus.” This means that if a prior art reference discloses a specific example (species) that…
Read MoreWhat special procedures are required for rejecting a claim based on a tentative abstract idea?
Rejecting a claim based on a tentative abstract idea requires special procedures and approval. The MPEP states: A rejection of a claim reciting a tentative abstract idea must be approved by the TC director (which approval will be indicated in the file record of the application) and must provide a justification for why such claim…
Read MoreWhat is the role of “sound scientific principle” in patent obviousness rejections?
What is the role of “sound scientific principle” in patent obviousness rejections? Sound scientific principles play a crucial role in supporting patent obviousness rejections. According to MPEP 2144.02: “The rationale to support a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 may rely on logic and sound scientific principle.” This means that patent examiners can use well-established scientific…
Read MoreAre software and business methods automatically considered abstract ideas?
No, software and business methods are not automatically considered abstract ideas. The MPEP clarifies: “It is clear from the body of judicial precedent that software and business methods are not excluded categories of subject matter. For example, the Supreme Court concluded that business methods are not “categorically outside of § 101’s scope,” stating that “a…
Read MoreCan social media posts be considered prior art?
Yes, social media posts can be considered prior art, provided they meet the public accessibility requirements. The MPEP specifically addresses this: “Social media websites on the Internet, such as YouTube®, Twitter®, Facebook®, and public forum posts, can be a source of prior art, provided the public accessibility requirements, as laid out in subsection I are…
Read MoreWhat is the “skilled in the art” standard for computer programming patents?
In cases involving both computer programming and another technology, the “skilled in the art” standard requires knowledge of both technologies. The MPEP states: “In regard to the “skilled in the art” standard, in cases involving both the art of computer programming, and another technology, the examiner must recognize that the knowledge of persons skilled in…
Read More