How does the USPTO determine if an SNQ exists for patent reexamination?

The USPTO determines if a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) exists for patent reexamination through a careful evaluation process. According to MPEP 2242:

“If a reexamination request relies on references already considered by the Office, the request must demonstrate that a substantial new question of patentability is raised by the art, when the art is considered under the current interpretation of the claims.”

The USPTO considers several factors when determining if an SNQ exists:

  • Whether the prior art is new or was previously considered
  • The relevance of the prior art to the claimed invention
  • Whether the prior art teaches a new, non-cumulative technological aspect
  • The current interpretation of the claims

If these factors suggest that the prior art raises a new question about the patentability of at least one claim, an SNQ may be found to exist, warranting reexamination.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2200 - Citation Of Prior Art And Ex Parte Reexamination Of Patents, MPEP 2242 - Criteria For Deciding Request Filed Under 35 U.S.C. 302, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: patent reexamination, Prior Art Evaluation, Snq Determination, USPTO