What is the difference between appealable and petitionable matters in patent prosecution?
In patent prosecution, there is an important distinction between appealable and petitionable matters. MPEP 1201 states:
“The line of demarcation between appealable matters for the Board and petitionable matters for the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (Director) should be carefully observed.”
Generally, appealable matters relate to the merits of the patent application and are decided by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Petitionable matters, on the other hand, are typically procedural issues decided by the Director of the USPTO. For example:
- Appealable: Rejections based on prior art or patentability issues
- Petitionable: Requirements for restriction, election of species, finality, non-entry of amendments, and holdings of abandonment
Understanding this distinction is crucial for patent applicants and attorneys to pursue the correct course of action when facing issues during patent prosecution.
To learn more: