Is it necessary for claim terms to match those in the specification?
No, it is not necessary for claim terms to exactly match those used in the specification. The MPEP 2173.05(e) states:
“There is no requirement that the words in the claim must match those used in the specification disclosure. Applicants are given a great deal of latitude in how they choose to define their invention so long as the terms and phrases used define the invention with a reasonable degree of clarity and precision.”
This flexibility allows inventors to use different terminology in claims as long as the meaning is clear and the invention is precisely defined. However, the terms used should still comply with the written description and enablement requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a).
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2100 - Patentability,
MPEP 2173.05(E) - Lack Of Antecedent Basis,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure