Can papers filed untimely in inter partes reexamination be considered later in the proceedings?
Yes, papers that were initially considered untimely and returned or expunged in inter partes reexamination can potentially be considered later in the proceedings. According to MPEP 2625: “If the submission of the returned/expunged papers is appropriate later in the proceedings, they may be filed, and accepted by the Office, at that time.” This provision allows…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the first Office action in inter partes reexamination?
The first Office action in inter partes reexamination is a crucial milestone that significantly impacts the submission of papers. According to MPEP 2625 and 37 CFR 1.939: “Unless otherwise authorized, no paper shall be filed prior to the initial Office action on the merits of the inter partes reexamination.” The significance of the first Office…
Read MoreWhat are the deadlines for complying with the Sequence Rules?
The Sequence Rules include specific deadlines for compliance, as mentioned in MPEP 2421.02. While the exact deadlines are not provided in this section, it’s noted that the rules define “the deadlines for complying with the requirements.” Key points about compliance deadlines: They are mandatory and must be strictly adhered to Specific deadlines may vary depending…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for a replacement deposit in patent applications?
According to MPEP 2407.04, the requirements for a replacement deposit are not more stringent than those for the original deposit. The section states: “The provisions of 37 CFR 1.805(f) recognize that since an original deposit may be made during the pendency of the application subject to the conditions of 37 CFR 1.809, a replacement deposit…
Read MoreWhat is the required term of deposit for biological materials in patent applications?
According to 37 CFR 1.806, the term of deposit for biological materials in patent applications must be: At least thirty (30) years from the date of deposit, and At least five (5) years after the most recent request for a sample was received by the depository. The MPEP states: A deposit made before or during…
Read MoreWhat regulations govern the conduct of derivation proceedings?
The conduct of derivation proceedings is governed by regulations prescribed by the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). According to MPEP 2310.01, which cites 35 U.S.C. 135(b): “The Director shall prescribe regulations setting forth standards for the conduct of derivation proceedings, including requiring parties to provide sufficient evidence to prove and…
Read MoreHow are prior art citations processed during inter partes reexamination?
The processing of prior art citations during inter partes reexamination is governed by 37 CFR 1.902. The regulation states: “Citations by the patent owner in accordance with § 1.933 and by an inter partes reexamination third party requester under § 1.915 or § 1.948 will be entered in the inter partes reexamination file.” However, the…
Read MoreWhat aspects are checked during the procedural review of a reexamination case?
The procedural review of a reexamination case focuses on ensuring compliance with various legal and administrative requirements. According to MPEP 2689, the CRU SPRS or TC QAS will: “(A) procedurally review the examiner’s action for compliance with the applicable provisions of the reexamination statute and regulations, and with reexamination policy, practice and procedure“ This review…
Read MoreWhat are the responsibilities of patent practitioners regarding information from other government agencies?
Patent practitioners have a responsibility to review and potentially disclose information received from other government agencies that may be material to patentability. The MPEP 2015 advises: “Similarly, each individual with a duty to disclose, or party with a duty of reasonable inquiry, should review documents it receives from other Government agencies to determine whether the…
Read MoreWhat happens if a protest is non-compliant with USPTO regulations?
According to MPEP 1901.06, the treatment of non-compliant protests depends on the nature and extent of the non-compliance: Protests that fail to comply with 37 CFR 1.291(b) or (c) may not be entered. However, if the error is minor and does not raise ambiguity about the protest’s content, it may still be entered at the…
Read More