What are the formatting requirements for papers filed in a supplemental examination proceeding?

According to MPEP 2807, all papers submitted in a supplemental examination proceeding must be formatted in accordance with 37 CFR 1.52. The MPEP states: “37 CFR 1.615(a) requires that all papers submitted in a supplemental examination proceeding must be formatted in accordance with 37 CFR 1.52.” This means that documents must follow specific guidelines for…

Read More

Are there fee reductions available for small entities and micro entities?

Yes, fee reductions are available for small entities and micro entities when filing a supplemental examination request. According to the MPEP: “These fees qualify for a 50 percent reduction for small entities and a 75 percent reduction for micro entities.” This reduction applies to the fees required for supplemental examination, including the filing fee, ex…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle requests for supplemental examination that only include correction of factual information?

When a request for supplemental examination only includes information limited to the correction of factual information (such as correcting a foreign priority or domestic benefit claim), it generally does not raise a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) by itself. The MPEP states: An item of information limited to a correction of factual information, alone,…

Read More

What is supplemental examination and how does it relate to ex parte reexamination?

Supplemental examination is a proceeding introduced by the America Invents Act (AIA) that allows patent owners to request the USPTO to consider, reconsider, or correct information relevant to their patent. If a substantial new question of patentability is raised, an ex parte reexamination will be ordered. The MPEP explains: “Section 12 of the AIA added…

Read More

What is the relationship between supplemental examination and ex parte reexamination?

Supplemental examination and ex parte reexamination are closely linked processes. The MPEP 2816.03 states: “If the determination concludes that a substantial new question of patentability is raised by one or more items of information in the request, ex parte reexamination of the patent will be ordered under 35 U.S.C. 257.” This means: Supplemental examination is…

Read More

How does supplemental examination affect patent enforceability?

Supplemental examination can have a significant impact on patent enforceability. According to the MPEP: “35 U.S.C. 257(c) specifies the effect of a supplemental examination under 35 U.S.C. 257(a) and any resulting ex parte reexamination under 35 U.S.C. 257(b) on the enforceability of the patent.” Generally, if information is considered, reconsidered, or corrected during supplemental examination,…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle supplemental examination requests involving domestic benefit claims?

The USPTO has specific procedures for handling supplemental examination requests involving domestic benefit claims. These procedures depend on whether the request is solely for correcting a benefit claim or includes additional items of information. For requests solely correcting a benefit claim, the MPEP states: If the only information provided with the request is solely directed…

Read More