How does the USPTO handle the timing of reexamination proceedings?

The USPTO is required to conduct reexamination proceedings with special dispatch. MPEP 2821 references 35 U.S.C. 305, which states: “Reexamination will be conducted with special dispatch within the Office.“ This requirement ensures that reexamination proceedings are handled promptly and efficiently. The MPEP also cites the case of Ethicon v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422 (Fed. Cir.…

Read More

What happens if reexamination proceedings are not merged?

When reexamination proceedings are not merged, they are typically conducted separately to maintain the “special dispatch” requirement. As explained in MPEP 2686.01: “If the Office does not merge, the first reexamination proceeding can be concluded, and any question of patentability raised by the second reexamination request can be resolved in the second proceeding, with no…

Read More

How are merged reexamination proceedings handled by the USPTO?

When reexamination proceedings are merged, the USPTO follows specific guidelines to ensure efficient handling: A single combined examiner’s action is prepared for all merged proceedings. Each action contains the control numbers of all involved proceedings on every page. A single action cover mailing sheet is used for all parties involved. The patent owner is required…

Read More

Can the Director make exceptions to the “special dispatch” requirement in inter partes reexamination?

Yes, the Director of the USPTO can make exceptions to the “special dispatch” requirement in inter partes reexamination proceedings for good cause. This is explicitly stated in 35 U.S.C. 314(c): “Unless otherwise provided by the Director for good cause, all inter partes reexamination proceedings under this section, including any appeal to the Board of Patent…

Read More

How does the USPTO decide whether to merge multiple reexamination proceedings?

The decision to merge multiple reexamination proceedings is made by the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) Director or their delegate, typically after reexamination is ordered for the second request. The decision is based on several factors: The need for “special dispatch” in conducting reexamination proceedings, as mandated by 35 U.S.C. 305. The stage of the first…

Read More

What are status reports in the context of patent reexamination, and why are they important?

Status reports in patent reexamination are weekly computer-generated reports that provide updates on the events and progress of reexamination proceedings. According to MPEP 2635: “Various weekly reports can be generated for the event reporting discussed above. The primary purpose of these computer outputs is to assure that reexaminations are, in fact, processed with ‘special dispatch’.”…

Read More

What is the “special dispatch” requirement for inter partes reexamination proceedings?

The “special dispatch” requirement for inter partes reexamination proceedings is a statutory mandate that these proceedings be conducted quickly. Key points include: It’s required by 35 U.S.C. 314(c). It applies to all aspects of the reexamination, including appeals. The Director can make exceptions for “good cause.” It’s a factor in decisions about suspending proceedings due…

Read More

What does “special dispatch” mean in the context of reexamination proceedings?

“Special dispatch” in the context of reexamination proceedings refers to the expedited handling and processing of these cases by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This term is derived from 35 U.S.C. 305 and is further explained in MPEP 2261. The MPEP states: “In view of the requirement for ‘special dispatch,’ reexamination proceedings…

Read More

What is “special dispatch” in inter partes reexamination proceedings?

“Special dispatch” is a requirement for inter partes reexamination proceedings as mandated by 35 U.S.C. 314(c). The MPEP states: “In view of the requirement for ‘special dispatch,’ all reexamination proceedings will be ‘special’ throughout their pendency in the Office.” This means that inter partes reexamination proceedings are given priority and expedited treatment throughout the entire…

Read More