What is a decision denying reexamination?
A decision denying reexamination is a formal response issued by a patent examiner when a request for inter partes reexamination fails to establish a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) or a reasonable likelihood of prevailing (RLP) based on patents or printed publications. As stated in the MPEP: “The request for reexamination will be denied…
Read MoreWhat standards are used to evaluate reexamination requests?
The standards used to evaluate reexamination requests have changed over time. For requests filed: Prior to September 16, 2011: The standard was “substantial new question of patentability” (SNQ). From September 16, 2011 to September 15, 2012: The standard was “reasonable likelihood that requester will prevail” (RLP). The MPEP provides specific language for each standard: “No…
Read MoreHow does the “reasonable likelihood that the requester will prevail” standard differ from the SNQ standard?
The “reasonable likelihood that the requester will prevail” (RLP) standard was introduced for reexaminations filed between September 16, 2011, and September 16, 2012. This standard is considered more stringent than the “substantial new question of patentability” (SNQ) standard. According to the MPEP, which cites House Rep. 112-98: “The threshold for initiating an inter partes review…
Read MoreHow do court decisions impact the determination of a substantial new question of patentability?
Court decisions can impact the determination of a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) or reasonable likelihood that the requester will prevail (RLP), but their influence varies depending on the nature of the decision. The MPEP outlines several scenarios: Final holding of validity: A final court decision that a patent claim is not invalid doesn’t…
Read More