How does the “without deceptive intention” requirement apply to reissue applications filed before September 16, 2012?

For reissue applications filed before September 16, 2012, the applicant must include a statement in the reissue oath or declaration that all errors being corrected arose without any deceptive intention. The MPEP provides a suggested statement to satisfy this requirement: “All errors corrected in the present reissue application up to the time of signing of…

Read More

What is the significance of the “at least one error” requirement in a reissue oath or declaration?

The “at least one error” requirement in a reissue oath or declaration is crucial for initiating the reissue process. MPEP 1414 states: “The reissue oath or declaration must also specifically identify at least one error being relied upon as the basis for reissue.” This requirement serves several important purposes: It establishes the legal basis for…

Read More

How are reissue oaths/declarations handled in continuation reissue applications?

The handling of reissue oaths/declarations in continuation reissue applications depends on whether the application was filed before or after September 16, 2012, and whether the oath/declaration covers the error being corrected. The MPEP provides guidance: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012: If the copy of the oath or declaration from the parent…

Read More

What are the requirements for a reissue oath or declaration in applications filed on or after September 16, 2012?

For reissue applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, the inventor’s oath or declaration must comply with the following requirements: Comply with 37 CFR 1.63, 1.64, or 1.67 Identify at least one error being relied upon as the basis for reissue State that the applicant believes the original patent to be wholly or partly…

Read More

How are reissue applications handled differently in terms of signatory authority?

Reissue applications are treated differently in terms of signatory authority, as indicated in MPEP 1005. This section specifies that actions related to reissue applications, particularly decisions on reissue oaths or declarations, require the signature of a primary examiner, Technology Center Director, or practice specialist. MPEP 1005 states: “Reissue applications (e.g., decisions on reissue oath or…

Read More