What information should a patent examiner be prepared to discuss in an interference suggestion?

According to MPEP 2304.04(a), when suggesting an interference, a patent examiner should be prepared to discuss several key points: Why the claims interfere Whether the subject matter of other claims would have been anticipated or rendered obvious if the interfering claims are treated as prior art Whether an applicant or patentee is entitled to claim…

Read More

How does an examiner initiate an interference proceeding?

An examiner can initiate an interference proceeding in two ways: Invite the applicant to suggest an interference pursuant to 37 CFR 41.202(a). Work with an Interference Practice Specialist (IPS) to suggest an interference to the Board. The MPEP states: “The examiner may invite the applicant to suggest an interference pursuant to 37 CFR 41.202(a). An…

Read More

What is Form PTO-850 in patent interference proceedings?

Form PTO-850 is a document that the patent examiner must complete when suggesting an interference to the Board. According to MPEP 2304.04(a), “The examiner must also complete Form PTO-850.” This form likely contains essential information about the suggested interference, including details about the interfering claims and the basis for the interference. To learn more: Form…

Read More

Are there exceptions to who conducts a reexamination?

Yes, there are exceptions to who conducts a reexamination. According to MPEP § 2255: “However, if a petition under 37 CFR 1.515(c) is granted after an examiner’s determination that found the request did not raise any SNQ, the reexamination will generally be conducted by another examiner.” This means that if a petition challenging the examiner’s…

Read More

What is the examiner’s burden in rejecting a patent application for lack of utility?

When an examiner concludes that a patent application claims an invention that is nonuseful, inoperative, or contradicts known scientific principles, they have the initial burden of providing evidence to support this conclusion. The MPEP states: “When the examiner concludes that an application claims an invention that is nonuseful, inoperative, or contradicts known scientific principles, the…

Read More

Can examiners perform additional prior art searches during reexamination?

Yes, examiners can perform additional prior art searches during reexamination, but with certain limitations. MPEP 2244 states: “If the examiner believes that additional prior art patents and publications can be readily obtained by searching to supply any deficiencies in the prior art cited in the request, the examiner can perform such an additional search. Such…

Read More