What is the timeline for preparing and reviewing an examiner’s answer in inter partes reexamination?
The timeline for preparing and reviewing an examiner’s answer in an inter partes reexamination proceeding is outlined in MPEP 2677. The key steps and timeframes are as follows: The examiner’s answer is to be completed by the examiner within two weeks after the appeal conference. After completion, the examiner obtains the initials of the appeal…
Read MoreWhat is the time period given to a patent owner to correct an omission in their response?
When a patent owner’s submission is not fully responsive due to an omission, the examiner typically provides a new time period for correction. According to MPEP 2666.30: “The patent owner should be notified of the deficiency and the correction needed, and given a new time period for response (usually one month) pursuant to 37 CFR…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for requesting rehearing of a Board decision?
According to MPEP 2682, the time limits for requesting rehearing of a Board decision are as follows: The request must be filed within one month from the date of: The original decision under 37 CFR 41.77(a) The original 37 CFR 41.77(b) decision under the provisions of 37 CFR 41.77(b)(2) The expiration of the time for…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for patent owner submissions after an ACP?
The time limits for patent owner submissions after an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) are as follows: The submission must be filed within the time period set for response to the ACP, typically 30 days or one month (whichever is longer) from the ACP mailing date. An extension may be requested under 37 CFR 1.956, but…
Read MoreHow long do parties have to correct defects in inter partes reexamination submissions?
Parties typically have one month or thirty days, whichever is longer, from the mailing date of the form PTOL-2069 or equivalent letter to correct defects in their submissions. The MPEP 2666.50 states: “A time period of one month or thirty days, whichever is longer, from the mailing date of the form PTOL-2069 or equivalent letter…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for a third party requester to comment on a patent owner’s response in inter partes reexamination?
In inter partes reexamination, the third party requester must file comments on a patent owner’s response within a specific time frame. While the exact time limit is not explicitly stated in the provided MPEP section, it is generally 30 days from the date of service of the patent owner’s response. This can be inferred from…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for third-party comments after a patent owner’s response in inter partes reexamination?
In inter partes reexamination, third parties have a specific time frame to submit comments after the patent owner’s response. According to MPEP 2666.05: “The third party requester comments must be filed “within 30 days from the date of service of the patent owner’s response.” This 30-day period is strictly enforced, and late submissions will not…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for filing an appeal in an inter partes reexamination proceeding?
According to MPEP 2683, the time limit for filing an appeal in an inter partes reexamination proceeding is specified in 37 CFR 1.304(a)(1): “The time for filing the notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (§ 1.302) or for commencing a civil action (§ 1.303) is two months from…
Read MoreWhat is the time frame for inter partes reexamination proceedings?
Inter partes reexamination proceedings are designed to be conducted with “special dispatch” to ensure timely resolution. According to MPEP 2609: Decision on the request must be made not later than three months from its filing date, and the remainder of proceedings must proceed with “special dispatch” within the Office; This means that the USPTO must…
Read MoreHow are requests for extensions of time after Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) handled?
Requests for extensions of time after Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) in inter partes reexamination are handled with caution, especially when related to submitting affidavits. Key points include: Granting an extension does not guarantee acceptance of the affidavit. Examiners may question why the affidavit was not presented earlier. Insufficient showings may result in denial of affidavit…
Read More