What are ‘inter partes questions’ in patent examination?
‘Inter partes questions’ in patent examination refer to issues or matters that involve multiple parties or have the potential to affect multiple parties’ interests. These questions typically arise in proceedings where there are opposing parties, such as in patent interferences or inter partes reexaminations. The MPEP 713.06 prohibits examiners from discussing such questions ex parte:…
Read MoreHow does the ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule affect patent applicants?
The ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule, as outlined in MPEP 713.06, affects patent applicants by: Ensuring fair treatment: All parties receive the same information and opportunities during the examination process. Limiting private communications: Applicants cannot discuss matters involving other parties with the examiner in private. Promoting transparency: All relevant discussions and decisions…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of violating the ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule?
Violating the ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule, as stated in MPEP 713.06, can have serious consequences for both examiners and applicants: For examiners: Potential disciplinary action, including warnings, suspension, or termination. For applicants: Risk of invalidation of patents or adverse decisions in the examination process. For both: Damage to professional reputation and…
Read MoreWhat does ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ mean in patent examination?
In patent examination, ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ means that an examiner is not allowed to discuss issues involving multiple parties (inter partes) with only one party present (ex parte). The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Section 713.06 states: The examiner may not discuss inter partes questions ex parte with any of…
Read More