What is the “rule of reason” in patent examination regarding inoperative subject matter?
The “rule of reason” in patent examination regarding inoperative subject matter refers to the approach examiners should take when evaluating claims that may include inoperative embodiments. According to MPEP 2164.08(b): “[T]he examiner must evaluate the assertion according to a rule of reason. ‘The rule of reason is applicable to the evaluation of the scope of…
Read MoreWhat is the “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule in patent enablement?
What is the “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule in patent enablement? The “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule is an important consideration in patent enablement. According to MPEP 2164.08(b): “A claim which reads on significant numbers of inoperative embodiments would render the claims nonenabled when the specification does not clearly identify the operative embodiments and undue experimentation is…
Read MoreHow does the “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule affect patent enablement?
How does the “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule affect patent enablement? The “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule plays a significant role in patent enablement. According to MPEP 2164.08: “Claims should be rejected as lacking enablement when the disclosure does not enable one skilled in the art to practice the claimed invention without undue experimentation. All questions of…
Read More