Does filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) affect the determination of the elected invention?
No, filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) does not change the determination of the elected invention. According to MPEP 818.02(a): “The claims originally presented and acted upon by the Office on their merits determine the invention elected by an applicant in the application, and in any request for continued examination (RCE) filed for the…
Read MoreHow does an examiner withdraw claims not directed to the elected invention?
When an examiner determines that certain claims are not directed to the elected invention, they are required to withdraw these claims from further consideration. This process is outlined in MPEP § 821, which states: “All claims that the examiner finds are not directed to the elected invention are withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner…
Read MoreWhat are linking claims in patent applications and how should they be treated?
Linking claims in patent applications are claims that link multiple inventions together. According to MPEP 814: “The generic or other linking claims should not be associated with any one of the linked inventions since such claims must be examined with the elected linked invention.” This means that examiners should not group linking claims with any…
Read MoreHow do linking claims affect restriction requirements?
Linking claims can affect restriction requirements in patent applications, but their presence doesn’t necessarily prevent a restriction. According to MPEP 809: “Where an application includes claims to distinct inventions as well as linking claims, restriction can nevertheless be required. The linking claims must be examined with, and thus are considered part of, the invention elected.”…
Read MoreHow is the elected invention determined in a patent application?
The elected invention in a patent application is determined by the claims that were originally presented and acted upon by the USPTO on their merits. MPEP 818.02(a) states: “The claims originally presented and acted upon by the Office on their merits determine the invention elected by an applicant in the application, and in any request…
Read MoreCan I cancel all claims to the elected invention and present only claims to the non-elected invention?
No, you cannot cancel all claims to the elected invention and present only claims to the non-elected invention after an election by original presentation. Such an amendment is considered non-responsive and will not be entered. The MPEP 821.03 clearly states: “An amendment canceling all claims drawn to the elected invention and presenting only claims drawn…
Read MoreWhat happens if an amendment cancels all claims to the elected invention in a patent application?
An amendment that cancels all claims drawn to the elected invention and presents only claims drawn to the nonelected invention is considered nonresponsive and should not be entered. MPEP 714.19 states: “An amendment canceling all claims drawn to the elected invention and presenting only claims drawn to the nonelected invention should not be entered. Such…
Read More